Dietary patterns derived from Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and the risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
File(s)
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background and aim: Colorectal cancer [CRC] is highly prevalent worldwide, with dietary habits being a major risk factor. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the observational evidence on the association between CRC and dietary patterns [DP] derived from Principal Component Analysis.
Design: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Web of Science, Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched to identify all eligible papers published up to July 2017. Any pre-defined cancer in the colon was included, namely colon-rectal cancer (CRC), colon cancer (CC), rectal cancer (RC), or proximal and distal CC, if available. Western (WDP) and prudent (PDP) dietary patterns were compared as a proxy to estimate ‘unhealthy’ (Rich in meat and processed foods) and ‘healthy’ diets (containing fruits or vegetables), respectively. Meta-analyses were carried out using random effects model to calculate overall risk estimates. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated comparing the highest versus the lowest categories of dietary patterns for any of the forms of colon cancer studied.
Results: 28 studies were meta-analysed. A WDP was associated with increased risk of CRC (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.11, 1.40), and of CC (RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.11, 1.52). A PDP was negatively associated with CRC (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.73, 0.91). Sensitivity analyses showed that individuals from North- and South- American countries had a significantly higher risk of CRC than those from other continents.
Conclusion: A PDP might reduce the risk of CRC. Conversely, a WDP is associated with a higher risk of disease.
Design: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Web of Science, Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched to identify all eligible papers published up to July 2017. Any pre-defined cancer in the colon was included, namely colon-rectal cancer (CRC), colon cancer (CC), rectal cancer (RC), or proximal and distal CC, if available. Western (WDP) and prudent (PDP) dietary patterns were compared as a proxy to estimate ‘unhealthy’ (Rich in meat and processed foods) and ‘healthy’ diets (containing fruits or vegetables), respectively. Meta-analyses were carried out using random effects model to calculate overall risk estimates. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated comparing the highest versus the lowest categories of dietary patterns for any of the forms of colon cancer studied.
Results: 28 studies were meta-analysed. A WDP was associated with increased risk of CRC (RR 1.25; 95% CI 1.11, 1.40), and of CC (RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.11, 1.52). A PDP was negatively associated with CRC (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.73, 0.91). Sensitivity analyses showed that individuals from North- and South- American countries had a significantly higher risk of CRC than those from other continents.
Conclusion: A PDP might reduce the risk of CRC. Conversely, a WDP is associated with a higher risk of disease.
Date Issued
2018-07-26
Date Acceptance
2018-05-24
Citation
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2018, 73, pp.366-386
ISSN
1476-5640
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Start Page
366
End Page
386
Journal / Book Title
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume
73
Copyright Statement
© 2019 Springer Nature Publishing AG
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Nutrition & Dietetics
COLON-CANCER
MEDITERRANEAN DIET
EATING PATTERNS
RECTAL-CANCER
FIBER INTAKE
LIFE-STYLE
CONSUMPTION
ADENOMA
VEGETABLES
COHORT
Nutrition & Dietetics
1111 Nutrition and Dietetics
1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences
0908 Food Sciences
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2018-06-30