Personalising airway clearance in chronic lung disease
File(s)160086.full.pdf (343.58 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
McIlwaine, M
Bradley, J
Elborn, JS
Moran, F
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
This review describes a framework for providing a personalised approach to selecting the most appropriate airway clearance technique (ACT) for each patient. It is based on a synthesis of the physiological evidence that supports the modulation of ventilation and expiratory airflow as a means of assisting airway clearance. Possession of a strong understanding of the physiological basis for ACTs will enable clinicians to decide which ACT best aligns with the individual patient's pathology in diseases with anatomical bronchiectasis and mucus hypersecretion.
The physiological underpinning of postural drainage is that by placing a patient in various positions, gravity enhances mobilisation of secretions. Newer ACTs are based on two other physiological premises: the ability to ventilate behind obstructed regions of the lung and the capacity to achieve the minimum expiratory airflow bias necessary to mobilise secretions. After reviewing each ACT to determine if it utilises both ventilation and expiratory flow, these physiological concepts are assessed against the clinical evidence to provide a mechanism for the effectiveness of each ACT. This article provides the clinical rationale necessary to determine the most appropriate ACT for each patient, thereby improving care.
The physiological underpinning of postural drainage is that by placing a patient in various positions, gravity enhances mobilisation of secretions. Newer ACTs are based on two other physiological premises: the ability to ventilate behind obstructed regions of the lung and the capacity to achieve the minimum expiratory airflow bias necessary to mobilise secretions. After reviewing each ACT to determine if it utilises both ventilation and expiratory flow, these physiological concepts are assessed against the clinical evidence to provide a mechanism for the effectiveness of each ACT. This article provides the clinical rationale necessary to determine the most appropriate ACT for each patient, thereby improving care.
Date Issued
2017-02-21
Date Acceptance
2016-11-29
Citation
European Respiratory Review, 2017, 26 (143)
ISSN
0905-9180
Publisher
European Respiratory Society
Journal / Book Title
European Respiratory Review
Volume
26
Issue
143
Copyright Statement
Copyright ©ERS 2017.
ERR articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0
ERR articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0
License URL
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Respiratory System
POSITIVE EXPIRATORY PRESSURE
FREQUENCY CHEST COMPRESSION
TERM COMPARATIVE TRIAL
CYSTIC-FIBROSIS
MUCUS CLEARANCE
COLLATERAL VENTILATION
AUTOGENIC DRAINAGE
POSTURAL DRAINAGE
PULMONARY VENTILATION
PHYSICAL-THERAPY
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
160086