Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Engineering
  3. Faculty of Engineering
  4. Spatial correlations between MRI-derived wall shear stress and vessel wall thickness in the carotid bifurcation
 
  • Details
Spatial correlations between MRI-derived wall shear stress and vessel wall thickness in the carotid bifurcation
File(s)
Spatial correlations between MRI-derived wall shear stress and vessel wall thickness in the carotid bifurcation.pdf (6.19 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
van Ooij, Pim
Cibis, Merih
Rowland, Ethan M
Vernooij, Meike W
van der Lugt, Aad
more
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To explore the possibility of creating three-dimensional (3D) estimation models for patient-specific wall thickness (WT) maps using patient-specific and cohort-averaged WT, wall shear stress (WSS), and vessel diameter maps in asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid bifurcations. METHODS: Twenty subjects (aged 75 ± 6 years [mean ± standard deviation], eight women) underwent a 1.5-T MRI examination. Non-gated 3D phase-contrast gradient-echo images and proton density-weighted echo-planar images were retrospectively assessed for WSS, diameter estimation, and WT measurements. Spearman's ρ and scatter plots were used to determine correlations between individual WT, WSS, and diameter maps. A bootstrapping technique was used to determine correlations between 3D cohort-averaged WT, WSS, and diameter maps. Linear regression between the cohort-averaged WT, WSS, and diameter maps was used to predict individual 3D WT. RESULTS: Spearman's ρ averaged over the subjects was - 0.24 ± 0.18 (p < 0.001) and 0.07 ± 0.28 (p = 0.413) for WT versus WSS and for WT versus diameter relations, respectively. Cohort-averaged ρ, averaged over 1000 bootstraps, was - 0.56 (95% confidence interval [- 0.74,- 0.38]) for WT versus WSS and 0.23 (95% confidence interval [- 0.06, 0.52]) for WT versus diameter. Scatter plots did not reveal relationships between individual WT and WSS or between WT and diameter data. Linear relationships between these parameters became apparent after averaging over the cohort. Spearman's ρ between the original and predicted WT maps was 0.21 ± 0.22 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With a combination of bootstrapping and cohort-averaging methods, 3D WT maps can be predicted from the individual 3D WSS and diameter maps. The methodology may help to elucidate pathological processes involving WSS in carotid atherosclerosis.
Date Issued
2018-10-10
Date Acceptance
2018-06-29
Citation
European Radiology Experimental, 2018, 2 (1)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/63787
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0058-1
ISSN
2509-9280
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Journal / Book Title
European Radiology Experimental
Volume
2
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s). 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Identifier
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30302598
PII: 10.1186/s41747-018-0058-1
Subjects
Atherosclerosis
Carotid artery
Mechanical stress
Wall thickness
Publication Status
Published
Coverage Spatial
England
Article Number
ARTN 27
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback