Severity of illness scores may misclassify critically ill obese patients
File(s)New_manuscript_obesity 161017.docx (28.71 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Objective:
Severity of illness scores rest on the assumption that patients have normal physiologic values at baseline and that patients with similar severity of illness scores have the same degree of deviation from their usual state. Prior studies have reported differences in baseline physiology, including laboratory markers, between obese and normal weight individuals, but these differences have not been analyzed in the ICU. We compared deviation from baseline of pertinent ICU laboratory test results between obese and normal weight patients, adjusted for the severity of illness.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study in a large ICU database.
Setting:
Tertiary teaching hospital.
Patients:
Obese and normal weight patients who had laboratory results documented between 3 days and 1 year prior to hospital admission.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements and Main Results:
Seven hundred sixty-nine normal weight patients were compared with 1,258 obese patients. After adjusting for the severity of illness score, age, comorbidity index, baseline laboratory result, and ICU type, the following deviations were found to be statistically significant: WBC 0.80 (95% CI, 0.27–1.33) × 109/L; p = 0.003; log (blood urea nitrogen) 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00–0.02); p = 0.014; log (creatinine) 0.03 (95% CI, 0.02–0.05), p < 0.001; with all deviations higher in obese patients. A logistic regression analysis suggested that after adjusting for age and severity of illness at least one of these deviations had a statistically significant effect on hospital mortality (p = 0.009).
Conclusions:
Among patients with the same severity of illness score, we detected clinically small but significant deviations in WBC, creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen from baseline in obese compared with normal weight patients. These small deviations are likely to be increasingly important as bigger data are analyzed in increasingly precise ways. Recognition of the extent to which all critically ill patients may deviate from their own baseline may improve the objectivity, precision, and generalizability of ICU mortality prediction and severity adjustment models.
Severity of illness scores rest on the assumption that patients have normal physiologic values at baseline and that patients with similar severity of illness scores have the same degree of deviation from their usual state. Prior studies have reported differences in baseline physiology, including laboratory markers, between obese and normal weight individuals, but these differences have not been analyzed in the ICU. We compared deviation from baseline of pertinent ICU laboratory test results between obese and normal weight patients, adjusted for the severity of illness.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study in a large ICU database.
Setting:
Tertiary teaching hospital.
Patients:
Obese and normal weight patients who had laboratory results documented between 3 days and 1 year prior to hospital admission.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements and Main Results:
Seven hundred sixty-nine normal weight patients were compared with 1,258 obese patients. After adjusting for the severity of illness score, age, comorbidity index, baseline laboratory result, and ICU type, the following deviations were found to be statistically significant: WBC 0.80 (95% CI, 0.27–1.33) × 109/L; p = 0.003; log (blood urea nitrogen) 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00–0.02); p = 0.014; log (creatinine) 0.03 (95% CI, 0.02–0.05), p < 0.001; with all deviations higher in obese patients. A logistic regression analysis suggested that after adjusting for age and severity of illness at least one of these deviations had a statistically significant effect on hospital mortality (p = 0.009).
Conclusions:
Among patients with the same severity of illness score, we detected clinically small but significant deviations in WBC, creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen from baseline in obese compared with normal weight patients. These small deviations are likely to be increasingly important as bigger data are analyzed in increasingly precise ways. Recognition of the extent to which all critically ill patients may deviate from their own baseline may improve the objectivity, precision, and generalizability of ICU mortality prediction and severity adjustment models.
Date Issued
2018-03
Date Acceptance
2017-10-14
Citation
Critical Care Medicine, 2018, 46 (3), pp.394-400
ISSN
0090-3493
Publisher
Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Start Page
394
End Page
400
Journal / Book Title
Critical Care Medicine
Volume
46
Issue
3
Copyright Statement
© 2018 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Sponsor
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) & alumni
Identifier
https://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Fulltext/2018/03000/Severity_of_Illness_Scores_May_Misclassify.7.aspx
Subjects
Aged
Case-Control Studies
Critical Illness
Female
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Male
Middle Aged
Obesity
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Humans
Obesity
Critical Illness
Severity of Illness Index
Case-Control Studies
Retrospective Studies
Aged
Middle Aged
Intensive Care Units
Female
Male
1103 Clinical Sciences
1110 Nursing
1117 Public Health and Health Services
Emergency & Critical Care Medicine
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2018-03