Is continuous electronic fetal monitoring useful for all women in labour?
File(s)CEFM91217.7ja ccl231117.docx (61.63 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Mullins, Edward
Lees, Christoph
Brocklehurst, Peter
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Routine monitoring of all women would prevent much neonatal morbidity, argue Edward Mullins and Christoph Lees, but Peter Brocklehurst believes that it will increase the risk of harm from unnecessary caesarean sections.
Date Issued
2017-12-05
Date Acceptance
2017-12-01
Citation
BMJ, 2017, 359
ISSN
0959-8138
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal / Book Title
BMJ
Volume
359
Copyright Statement
© 2017 The Author(s). This article has been accepted for publication in the BMJ following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version is available online at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j5423
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000417559000003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Medicine, General & Internal
General & Internal Medicine
RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL
CEREBRAL-PALSY
INTRAPARTUM HYPOXIA
HEART-RATE
OUTCOMES
INFANT
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
ARTN j5423