Elective cancer surgery in COVID-19–free surgical pathways during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: an international, multicenter, comparative cohort study
File(s)jco.20.01933.pdf (1.28 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Glasbey, James C
Bhangu, Aneel
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
PURPOSE
As cancer surgery restarts after the first COVID-19 wave, health care providers urgently require data to determine where elective surgery is best performed. This study aimed to determine whether COVID-19–free surgical pathways were associated with lower postoperative pulmonary complication rates compared with hospitals with no defined pathway.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This international, multicenter cohort study included patients who underwent elective surgery for 10 solid cancer types without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Participating hospitals included patients from local emergence of SARS-CoV-2 until April 19, 2020. At the time of surgery, hospitals were defined as having a COVID-19–free surgical pathway (complete segregation of the operating theater, critical care, and inpatient ward areas) or no defined pathway (incomplete or no segregation, areas shared with patients with COVID-19). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unexpected ventilation).
RESULTS
Of 9,171 patients from 447 hospitals in 55 countries, 2,481 were operated on in COVID-19–free surgical pathways. Patients who underwent surgery within COVID-19–free surgical pathways were younger with fewer comorbidities than those in hospitals with no defined pathway but with similar proportions of major surgery. After adjustment, pulmonary complication rates were lower with COVID-19–free surgical pathways (2.2% v 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86). This was consistent in sensitivity analyses for low-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1/2), propensity score–matched models, and patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 preoperative tests. The postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was also lower in COVID-19–free surgical pathways (2.1% v 3.6%; aOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.76).
CONCLUSION
Within available resources, dedicated COVID-19–free surgical pathways should be established to provide safe elective cancer surgery during current and before future SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks.
As cancer surgery restarts after the first COVID-19 wave, health care providers urgently require data to determine where elective surgery is best performed. This study aimed to determine whether COVID-19–free surgical pathways were associated with lower postoperative pulmonary complication rates compared with hospitals with no defined pathway.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This international, multicenter cohort study included patients who underwent elective surgery for 10 solid cancer types without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Participating hospitals included patients from local emergence of SARS-CoV-2 until April 19, 2020. At the time of surgery, hospitals were defined as having a COVID-19–free surgical pathway (complete segregation of the operating theater, critical care, and inpatient ward areas) or no defined pathway (incomplete or no segregation, areas shared with patients with COVID-19). The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unexpected ventilation).
RESULTS
Of 9,171 patients from 447 hospitals in 55 countries, 2,481 were operated on in COVID-19–free surgical pathways. Patients who underwent surgery within COVID-19–free surgical pathways were younger with fewer comorbidities than those in hospitals with no defined pathway but with similar proportions of major surgery. After adjustment, pulmonary complication rates were lower with COVID-19–free surgical pathways (2.2% v 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.86). This was consistent in sensitivity analyses for low-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1/2), propensity score–matched models, and patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 preoperative tests. The postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was also lower in COVID-19–free surgical pathways (2.1% v 3.6%; aOR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.76).
CONCLUSION
Within available resources, dedicated COVID-19–free surgical pathways should be established to provide safe elective cancer surgery during current and before future SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks.
Date Issued
2020-10-06
Date Acceptance
2020-08-28
Citation
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 39 (1), pp.66-78
ISSN
0732-183X
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Start Page
66
End Page
78
Journal / Book Title
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume
39
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Identifier
https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.20.01933
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Oncology
OUTCOMES
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
COVID-19
Cohort Studies
Critical Care
Elective Surgical Procedures
Epidemics
Female
Humans
International Cooperation
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Postoperative Complications
SARS-CoV-2
COVIDSurg Collaborative
Humans
Neoplasms
Postoperative Complications
Critical Care
Logistic Models
Cohort Studies
International Cooperation
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Middle Aged
Female
Male
Epidemics
Elective Surgical Procedures
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
1103 Clinical Sciences
1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2020-10-06