Intra- and interprofessional practices through fresh eyes: a qualitative analysis of medical students’ early workplace experiences
File(s)Leedham-Green_Intra-and interprofessional pratices_BMC.pdf (1.3 MB)
Published verison
Author(s)
Leedham-Green, Kathleen
Iedema, Rick
Knight, Alec
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Professional identities are influenced by experiences in the clinical workplace including socialisation processes that may be hidden from academic faculty and potentially divergent from formal curricula. With the current educational emphasis on complexity, preparedness for practice, patient safety and team-working it is necessary to evaluate and respond to what students are learning about collaborative practices during their clinical placements.
Methods
394 second year medical students at a London medical school were invited to submit a short formative essay as part of their coursework describing, evaluating and reflecting on their experiences of how healthcare professionals work together. Their experiences were derived from having spent two days each week for 25 weeks in clinical contexts across primary and secondary care. We consented 311 participants and used a Consensual Qualitative Research approach to analyse these essays, creating a ‘students-eye view’ of intra- and interprofessional practices in the workplace.
Results
We identified four overarching themes in students’ essays:
Theme 1: analyses of contextual factors driving team tensions including staff shortages, shifting teams, and infrastructural issues;
Theme 2: observations of hierarchical and paternalistic attitudes and behaviours;
Theme 3: respect for team members’ ability to manage and mitigate tensions and attitudes; and
Theme 4: take-forward learning including enthusiasm for quality improvement and system change.
Conclusions
Students are being socialised into a complex, hierarchical, pressurised clinical workplace and experience wide variations in professional behaviours and practices. They articulate a need to find constructive ways forward in the interests of staff wellbeing and patient care. We present educational recommendations including providing safe reflective spaces, using students’ lived experience as raw material for systems thinking and quality improvement, and closing the feedback loop with placement sites on behalf of students.
Professional identities are influenced by experiences in the clinical workplace including socialisation processes that may be hidden from academic faculty and potentially divergent from formal curricula. With the current educational emphasis on complexity, preparedness for practice, patient safety and team-working it is necessary to evaluate and respond to what students are learning about collaborative practices during their clinical placements.
Methods
394 second year medical students at a London medical school were invited to submit a short formative essay as part of their coursework describing, evaluating and reflecting on their experiences of how healthcare professionals work together. Their experiences were derived from having spent two days each week for 25 weeks in clinical contexts across primary and secondary care. We consented 311 participants and used a Consensual Qualitative Research approach to analyse these essays, creating a ‘students-eye view’ of intra- and interprofessional practices in the workplace.
Results
We identified four overarching themes in students’ essays:
Theme 1: analyses of contextual factors driving team tensions including staff shortages, shifting teams, and infrastructural issues;
Theme 2: observations of hierarchical and paternalistic attitudes and behaviours;
Theme 3: respect for team members’ ability to manage and mitigate tensions and attitudes; and
Theme 4: take-forward learning including enthusiasm for quality improvement and system change.
Conclusions
Students are being socialised into a complex, hierarchical, pressurised clinical workplace and experience wide variations in professional behaviours and practices. They articulate a need to find constructive ways forward in the interests of staff wellbeing and patient care. We present educational recommendations including providing safe reflective spaces, using students’ lived experience as raw material for systems thinking and quality improvement, and closing the feedback loop with placement sites on behalf of students.
Date Issued
2019-07-29
Date Acceptance
2019-07-22
Citation
BMC Medical Education, 2019, 19
ISSN
1472-6920
Publisher
BioMed Central
Journal / Book Title
BMC Medical Education
Volume
19
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s). 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link tothe Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Subjects
Attitudes
Education
Hidden curriculum
Interprofessional education
Medical
Primary health care
Secondary care
Socialization
Students
Undergraduate
Medical Informatics
1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy
1117 Public Health and Health Services
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
ARTN 287