Stochastic switching in biology: from genotype to phenotype
File(s)switchR1.pdf (2.61 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Bressloff, Paul C
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
There has been a resurgence of interest in non-equilibrium stochastic processes in recent years, driven in part by the observation that the number of molecules (genes, mRNA, proteins) involved in gene expression are often of order 1–1000. This means that deterministic mass-action kinetics tends to break down, and one needs to take into account the discrete, stochastic nature of biochemical reactions. One of the major consequences of molecular noise is the occurrence of stochastic biological switching at both the genotypic and phenotypic levels. For example, individual gene regulatory networks can switch between graded and binary responses, exhibit translational/transcriptional bursting, and support metastability (noise-induced switching between states that are stable in the deterministic limit). If random switching persists at the phenotypic level then this can confer certain advantages to cell populations growing in a changing environment, as exemplified by bacterial persistence in response to antibiotics. Gene expression at the single-cell level can also be regulated by changes in cell density at the population level, a process known as quorum sensing. In contrast to noise-driven phenotypic switching, the switching mechanism in quorum sensing is stimulus-driven and thus noise tends to have a detrimental effect. A common approach to modeling stochastic gene expression is to assume a large but finite system and to approximate the discrete processes by continuous processes using a system-size expansion. However, there is a growing need to have some familiarity with the theory of stochastic processes that goes beyond the standard topics of chemical master equations, the system-size expansion, Langevin equations and the Fokker–Planck equation. Examples include stochastic hybrid systems (piecewise deterministic Markov processes), large deviations and the Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin (WKB) method, adiabatic reductions, and queuing/renewal theory. The major aim of this review is to provide a self-contained survey of these mathematical methods, mainly within the context of biological switching processes at both the genotypic and phenotypic levels. However, applications to other examples of biological switching are also discussed, including stochastic ion channels, diffusion in randomly switching environments, bacterial chemotaxis, and stochastic neural networks.
Date Issued
2017-03-31
Date Acceptance
2017-02-02
Citation
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 2017, 50 (13)
ISSN
1751-8113
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Journal / Book Title
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical
Volume
50
Issue
13
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2017 IOP Publishing Ltd. This is an author-created, un-copyedited version of an article published in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. IOP Publishing Ltd is not responsible for any errors or omissions in this version of the manuscript or any version derived from it. The Version of Record is available online at 10.1088/1751-8121/aa5db4
Identifier
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa5db4
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
133001
Date Publish Online
2017-02-28