Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • About
  • Communities & Collections
  • Advanced Search
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. Faculty of Medicine
  4. Land-use drivers of forest fragmentation vary with spatial scale
 
  • Details
Land-use drivers of forest fragmentation vary with spatial scale
File(s)
effects_of_scale_of_fragmentation_on_fitness_draft_20.docx (137.46 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Cattarino, L
McAlpine, CA
Rhodes, JR
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Aim

Improving our understanding of the drivers of forest fragmentation is fundamental to mitigating the consequences of anthropogenic fragmentation for biodiversity. Moreover, the impacts of fragmentation on biodiversity depend on the spatial scale at which fragmentation occurs. Therefore, understanding how the effect of land use on fragmentation patterns varies across scales is critical to ensure that fragmentation is managed at scales relevant to the ecology of target species or to land management. Here, we quantified the influence of land use on patterns of forest fragmentation at different scales using Queensland, Australia, as a case study.
Location

North-eastern Australia.
Methods

We combined fractal analysis with piecewise linear regression to measure patterns of forest fragmentation across a range of scales in 5309 landscapes of c. 50 km2, with different proportions of land used for cropping and grazing. A significant change in fragmentation patterns occurred at approximately 1 km2. We used beta regression to quantify the impact of land use on the degree of fragmentation at scales finer and coarser than 1 km2.
Results

The use of land for grazing tended to create more fragmented forest patterns than use of land for cropping. This difference was more pronounced at coarser than finer scales.
Main conclusions

Our finding suggests that the choice of land use where conservation actions, such as revegetation and retention of forest patches, are to be prioritized depends on the scale at which we measure fragmentation. This information contributes to reducing the risk of mismatches between the scale at which fragmentation is managed and the scale at which fragmentation is measured, which is often dictated by the scale of species movements or the scale of land management. Our finding also improves our capacity to discern between fragmentation patterns that are typical of land-sharing and land-sparing conservation strategies, as spatial scale varies, thus aiding the implementation of land sparing and land sharing at scales relevant to biodiversity conservation and land management.
Date Issued
2014-05-26
Date Acceptance
2014-05-01
Citation
Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2014, 23 (11), pp.1215-1224
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/30617
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/geb.12187
ISSN
1466-8238
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
1215
End Page
1224
Journal / Book Title
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Volume
23
Issue
11
Copyright Statement
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is the accepted version of the following article, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.12187/abstract
Subjects
Ecology
0602 Ecology
0501 Ecological Applications
Publication Status
Published
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback