Health care professionals’ experiences of pain management in the intensive care unit: a qualitative study
Author(s)
Bhattacharyya, Adrija
Laycock, Helen
Brett, Stephen
Beatty, Frances
Kemp, Harriet
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Despite the existence of evidence-based guidelines for the assessment and management of pain in the critical care setting, the prevalence of acute pain remains high. Inadequate pain management is associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation, reduced capacity for rehabilitation and long-term psychological sequelae. This study aimed to describe the experiences of pain management from healthcare professionals working in intensive care units (ICUs), in order to understand any targetable barriers to delivering effective pain management in critical care.
Healthcare professionals were recruited from ICUs in London (UK) using a purposive sampling technique to ensure a range of seniority, roles and environments. Semi-structured interviews, using an interview guide were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis technique. Thirty participants were recruited from eight diverse ICUs. Five themes were identified. First, there was a lack of consensus in pain assessment in the ICU where nursing staff described more knowledge and confidence of validated pain measures than physicians and concerns over validity and usability were raised. Second, there was a universal perception of resource availability impacting the quality of pain management including high clinical workload, staff turnover and availability of certain pain management techniques. Third, acknowledgment of the importance of pain management was highest in those with experience of interacting with critical care survivors. Fourth, participants described their own emotional reaction to managing those in pain which influenced their learning. Finally, there was a perception that, due to the complexity of the ICU population, pain was de-prioritised and there were conflicting views as to whether standardised analgosedation algorithms were useful. This study highlights the differing perceptions around pain management in ICU based on role and provides evidence to suggest interdisciplinary training, collaboratively designed decision-making tools, prioritisation initiatives and research priorities are areas that could be targeted to improve pain management in critical care.
Healthcare professionals were recruited from ICUs in London (UK) using a purposive sampling technique to ensure a range of seniority, roles and environments. Semi-structured interviews, using an interview guide were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis technique. Thirty participants were recruited from eight diverse ICUs. Five themes were identified. First, there was a lack of consensus in pain assessment in the ICU where nursing staff described more knowledge and confidence of validated pain measures than physicians and concerns over validity and usability were raised. Second, there was a universal perception of resource availability impacting the quality of pain management including high clinical workload, staff turnover and availability of certain pain management techniques. Third, acknowledgment of the importance of pain management was highest in those with experience of interacting with critical care survivors. Fourth, participants described their own emotional reaction to managing those in pain which influenced their learning. Finally, there was a perception that, due to the complexity of the ICU population, pain was de-prioritised and there were conflicting views as to whether standardised analgosedation algorithms were useful. This study highlights the differing perceptions around pain management in ICU based on role and provides evidence to suggest interdisciplinary training, collaboratively designed decision-making tools, prioritisation initiatives and research priorities are areas that could be targeted to improve pain management in critical care.
Date Issued
2024-06
Date Acceptance
2023-11-24
Citation
Anaesthesia, 2024, 79 (6), pp.611-626
ISSN
0003-2409
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
611
End Page
626
Journal / Book Title
Anaesthesia
Volume
79
Issue
6
Copyright Statement
© 2023 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists. 1
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
License URL
Identifier
https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16209
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2023-12-28