Does electronic monitoring influence adherence to medication? Randomized controlled trial of measurement reactivity
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Electronic monitoring is recommended for accurate measurement of medication adherence but a possible limitation is that it may influence adherence.
Purpose
To test the reactive effect of electronic monitoring in a randomized controlled trial.
Methods
A total of 226 adults with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c ≥58 mmol/mol were randomized to receiving their main oral glucose lowering medication in electronic containers or standard packaging. The primary outcomes were self-reported adherence measured with the MARS (Medication Adherence Report Scale; range 5–25) and HbA1c at 8 weeks.
Results
Non-significantly higher adherence and lower HbA1c were observed in the electronic container group (differences in means, adjusting for baseline value: MARS, 0.4 [95 % CI −0.1 to 0.8, p = 0.11]; HbA1c (mmol/mol), −1.02 [−2.73 to 0.71, p = 0.25]).
Conclusions
Electronic containers may lead to a small increase in adherence but this potential limitation is outweighed by their advantages. Our findings support electronic monitoring as the method of choice in research on medication adherence. (Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCT N30522359)
Electronic monitoring is recommended for accurate measurement of medication adherence but a possible limitation is that it may influence adherence.
Purpose
To test the reactive effect of electronic monitoring in a randomized controlled trial.
Methods
A total of 226 adults with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c ≥58 mmol/mol were randomized to receiving their main oral glucose lowering medication in electronic containers or standard packaging. The primary outcomes were self-reported adherence measured with the MARS (Medication Adherence Report Scale; range 5–25) and HbA1c at 8 weeks.
Results
Non-significantly higher adherence and lower HbA1c were observed in the electronic container group (differences in means, adjusting for baseline value: MARS, 0.4 [95 % CI −0.1 to 0.8, p = 0.11]; HbA1c (mmol/mol), −1.02 [−2.73 to 0.71, p = 0.25]).
Conclusions
Electronic containers may lead to a small increase in adherence but this potential limitation is outweighed by their advantages. Our findings support electronic monitoring as the method of choice in research on medication adherence. (Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCT N30522359)
Date Issued
2014-12-01
Date Acceptance
2014-02-01
Citation
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2014, 48 (3), pp.293-299
ISSN
0883-6612
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Start Page
293
End Page
299
Journal / Book Title
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume
48
Issue
3
Copyright Statement
# The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com.
Sponsor
Medical Research Council
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000346919400004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Grant Number
G0500267
Subjects
Social Sciences
Psychology, Multidisciplinary
Psychology
Measurement reactivity
Medication adherence
Electronic monitoring
Diabetes
SUPPORT PATIENTS
DRUG-THERAPY
SELF-REPORT
INTERVENTION
VALIDITY
ASTHMA
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2014-02-27