Progressive collapse response of steel and composite buildings
Author(s)
Stylianidis, Panagiotis
Type
Thesis
Abstract
Subsequent to the World Trade Centre collapses in 2001, general interest into structural
robustness and progressive collapse has been significantly heightened. It is recognised that
the current prescriptive rules employed in the design of building structures to resist
progressive collapse need to be replaced by performance-based approaches. A continuing
research program at Imperial College London aims at the development of a complete design
method that will address the basic features of progressive collapse whilst being tractable in
terms of complexity for routine use in practice. An important step towards that objective is
the proper treatment and understanding of the fundamental mechanics of the problem. The
current study is motivated by that requirement and seeks to build on previous developments
at Imperial to explore the progressive collapse response of steel and composite buildings on
a quantitative basis. At first, the study is dedicated to the development of a simplified
model for representation of the connection behaviour. The model is incorporated into a
slope-deflection approach and an analytical method for prediction of the nonlinear static
response of steel and composite beams following column removal – i.e. a common design
scenario for progressive collapse – is derived. The method is carefully validated and
applied in a detailed study of the response of axially restrained beams in progressive
collapse, where the most important structural parameters and their effects on performance
are identified. Based on those outcomes, the behaviour of bare steel and composite grillage
systems following sudden column loss is subsequently appraised. It is concluded that
progressive collapse resistance depends on the interplay between the connection moment
capacities and ductility. Performance may also be enhanced by compressive arching action
in the presence of axial restraint; however, for average values of connection ductility,
failure typically occurs prior to the development of significant tensile catenary action.
Therefore, it is suggested that design methods for progressive collapse should be primarily
oriented towards the prediction of appropriate values for the connection moment capacities.
robustness and progressive collapse has been significantly heightened. It is recognised that
the current prescriptive rules employed in the design of building structures to resist
progressive collapse need to be replaced by performance-based approaches. A continuing
research program at Imperial College London aims at the development of a complete design
method that will address the basic features of progressive collapse whilst being tractable in
terms of complexity for routine use in practice. An important step towards that objective is
the proper treatment and understanding of the fundamental mechanics of the problem. The
current study is motivated by that requirement and seeks to build on previous developments
at Imperial to explore the progressive collapse response of steel and composite buildings on
a quantitative basis. At first, the study is dedicated to the development of a simplified
model for representation of the connection behaviour. The model is incorporated into a
slope-deflection approach and an analytical method for prediction of the nonlinear static
response of steel and composite beams following column removal – i.e. a common design
scenario for progressive collapse – is derived. The method is carefully validated and
applied in a detailed study of the response of axially restrained beams in progressive
collapse, where the most important structural parameters and their effects on performance
are identified. Based on those outcomes, the behaviour of bare steel and composite grillage
systems following sudden column loss is subsequently appraised. It is concluded that
progressive collapse resistance depends on the interplay between the connection moment
capacities and ductility. Performance may also be enhanced by compressive arching action
in the presence of axial restraint; however, for average values of connection ductility,
failure typically occurs prior to the development of significant tensile catenary action.
Therefore, it is suggested that design methods for progressive collapse should be primarily
oriented towards the prediction of appropriate values for the connection moment capacities.
Date Issued
2011-09
Date Awarded
2011-12
Copyright Statement
Attribution NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-ND)
Advisor
Izzuddin, Bassam
Elghazouli, Ahmed
Nethercot, David
Creator
Stylianidis, Panagiotis
Publisher Department
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Publisher Institution
Imperial College London
Qualification Level
Doctoral
Qualification Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)