Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • About
  • Communities & Collections
  • Advanced Search
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. School of Public Health
  4. School of Public Health
  5. Implications of alternative definitions of prediabetes for prevalence in US adults
 
  • Details
Implications of alternative definitions of prediabetes for prevalence in US adults
File(s)
Implications of alternative definitions of prediabetes for prevalence in U.S. adults.pdf (102.61 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
James, Cherie
Bullard, Kai McKeever
Rolka, Deborah B
Geiss, Linda S
Williams, Desmond E
more
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To compare the prevalence of prediabetes using A1C, fasting plasma glucose
(FPG), and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) criteria, and to examine the degree of agreement
between the measures.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We used the 2005–2008 National Health and
Nutrition Examination Surveys to classify 3,627 adults aged $18 years without diabetes according to their prediabetes status using A1C, FPG, and OGTT. We compared the prevalence of
prediabetes according to different measures and used conditional probabilities to examine agreement between measures.
RESULTS—In 2005–2008, the crude prevalence of prediabetes in adults aged $18 years was
14.2% for A1C 5.7–6.4% (A1C5.7), 26.2% for FPG 100–125 mg/dL (IFG100), 7.0% for FPG
110–125 mg/dL (IFG110), and 13.7% for OGTT 140–199 mg/dL (IGT). Prediabetes prevalence
varied by age, sex, and race/ethnicity, and there was considerable discordance between measures
of prediabetes. Among those with IGT, 58.2, 23.4, and 32.3% had IFG100, IFG110, and A1C5.7,
respectively, and 67.1% had the combination of either A1C5.7 or IFG100.
CONCLUSIONS—The prevalence of prediabetes varied by the indicator used to measure
risk; there was considerable discordance between indicators and the characteristics of individuals
with prediabetes. Programs to prevent diabetes may need to consider issues of equity, resources,
need, and efficiency in targeting their efforts.
Date Issued
2011-02-01
Date Acceptance
2010-11-17
Citation
Diabetes Care, 2011, 34 (2), pp.387-391
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/71860
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1314
ISSN
0149-5992
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Start Page
387
End Page
391
Journal / Book Title
Diabetes Care
Volume
34
Issue
2
Copyright Statement
© 2011 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly
cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000287433900026&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Endocrinology & Metabolism
IMPAIRED GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE
LIFE-STYLE
GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN
CARDIOVASCULAR RISK
FASTING GLYCEMIA
PREVENTION
IMPACT
A1C
DIAGNOSIS
PEOPLE
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2011-02-01
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback