Development and validation of subject-specific pediatric multibody knee kinematic models with ligamentous constraints
File(s)Barzan et al. JBiomech 2019 plus supplem mat.pdf (6.9 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Computational knee models that replicate the joint motion are important tools to discern difficult-to-measure functional joint biomechanics. Numerous knee kinematic models of different complexity, with either generic or subject-specific anatomy, have been presented and used to predict three-dimensional tibiofemoral (TFJ) and patellofemoral (PFJ) joint kinematics of cadavers or healthy adults, but not pediatric populations.
The aims of this study were: (i) to develop subject-specific TFJ and PFJ kinematic models, with TFJ models having either rigid or extensible ligament constraints, for eight healthy pediatric participants and (ii) to validate the estimated joint and ligament kinematics against in vivo kinematics measured from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at four TFJ flexion angles.
Three different TFJ models were created from MRIs and used to solve the TFJ kinematics: (i) 5-rigid-link parallel mechanism with rigid surface contact and isometric anterior cruciate (ACL), posterior cruciate (PCL) and medial collateral (MCL) ligaments (Δ, (ii) 6-link parallel mechanism with minimized ACL, PCL, MCL and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) length changes (Δ and (iii) 6-link parallel mechanism with prescribed ACL, PCL, MCL and LCL length variations (Δ). Each model’s geometrical parameters were optimized using a Multiple Objective Particle Swarm algorithm.
When compared to MRI-measured data, Δ and Δ performed the best, with average root mean square errors below 6.93° and 4.23 mm for TFJ and PFJ angles and displacements, respectively, and below 2.01 mm for ligament lengths (<4.32% ligament strain). Therefore, within these error ranges, Δ and Δ can be used to estimate three-dimensional pediatric TFJ, PFJ and ligament kinematics and can be incorporated into lower-limb models to estimate joint kinematics and kinetics during dynamic tasks.
The aims of this study were: (i) to develop subject-specific TFJ and PFJ kinematic models, with TFJ models having either rigid or extensible ligament constraints, for eight healthy pediatric participants and (ii) to validate the estimated joint and ligament kinematics against in vivo kinematics measured from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at four TFJ flexion angles.
Three different TFJ models were created from MRIs and used to solve the TFJ kinematics: (i) 5-rigid-link parallel mechanism with rigid surface contact and isometric anterior cruciate (ACL), posterior cruciate (PCL) and medial collateral (MCL) ligaments (Δ, (ii) 6-link parallel mechanism with minimized ACL, PCL, MCL and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) length changes (Δ and (iii) 6-link parallel mechanism with prescribed ACL, PCL, MCL and LCL length variations (Δ). Each model’s geometrical parameters were optimized using a Multiple Objective Particle Swarm algorithm.
When compared to MRI-measured data, Δ and Δ performed the best, with average root mean square errors below 6.93° and 4.23 mm for TFJ and PFJ angles and displacements, respectively, and below 2.01 mm for ligament lengths (<4.32% ligament strain). Therefore, within these error ranges, Δ and Δ can be used to estimate three-dimensional pediatric TFJ, PFJ and ligament kinematics and can be incorporated into lower-limb models to estimate joint kinematics and kinetics during dynamic tasks.
Date Issued
2019-08-27
Date Acceptance
2019-07-02
Citation
Journal of Biomechanics, 2019, 93, pp.194-203
ISSN
0021-9290
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Start Page
194
End Page
203
Journal / Book Title
Journal of Biomechanics
Volume
93
Copyright Statement
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Subjects
0903 Biomedical Engineering
1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences
0913 Mechanical Engineering
Biomedical Engineering
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2019-07-08