Assessment of lung cancer risk based on a biomarker panel of circulating proteins
File(s)Supplementary Material.docx (552.43 KB)
Supporting information
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Importance: There is an urgent need to improve lung cancer risk assessment as current screening criteria miss a large proportion of cases.
Objective: To determine if a panel of selected circulating protein biomarkers can contribute to lung cancer risk assessment and outperform current US screening criteria.
Design, Setting and Participants: Pre-diagnostic samples from ever-smoking cases diagnosed within one year of blood collection and smoking-matched controls from the Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET) cohort were used to develop a biomarker risk-score based on 4 proteins (CA125, CEA, CYFRA 21-1 and Pro-SFTPB). The biomarker score was subsequently validated blindly using absolute risk-estimates in ever-smoking cases diagnosed within one year of blood collection and matched controls from two large European population-based cohorts; the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition (EPIC) study and the Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study (NSHDS).
Main Outcome and Measures: Model validity in discriminating between future lung cancer cases and controls. Discrimination estimates were weighted to reflect the background populations of EPIC and NSHDS validation studies (area under receiver-operating characteristics curve [AUC], sensitivity and specificity).
Results: In the validation study, an integrated risk-prediction model combining smoking exposure with the biomarker score yielded an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76-0.90) compared to 0.73 (95% CI: 0.64-0.82) for a model based on smoking exposure alone (P=0.003 for difference in AUC). At an overall specificity of 0.83 based on the USPSTF screening criteria, the sensitivity of the integrated risk-prediction model (biomarker) model was 0.63 compared to 0.43 for the smoking model. Conversely, at an overall sensitivity of 0.42 (USPSTF), the integrated risk-prediction model yielded a specificity of 0.95 compared to 0.86 for the smoking model.
Conclusions and Relevance: This study provided a proof-of-principle in demonstrating that a panel of circulating protein biomarkers can improve lung cancer risk assessment and may be used to define eligibility for CT-screening.
Objective: To determine if a panel of selected circulating protein biomarkers can contribute to lung cancer risk assessment and outperform current US screening criteria.
Design, Setting and Participants: Pre-diagnostic samples from ever-smoking cases diagnosed within one year of blood collection and smoking-matched controls from the Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET) cohort were used to develop a biomarker risk-score based on 4 proteins (CA125, CEA, CYFRA 21-1 and Pro-SFTPB). The biomarker score was subsequently validated blindly using absolute risk-estimates in ever-smoking cases diagnosed within one year of blood collection and matched controls from two large European population-based cohorts; the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition (EPIC) study and the Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study (NSHDS).
Main Outcome and Measures: Model validity in discriminating between future lung cancer cases and controls. Discrimination estimates were weighted to reflect the background populations of EPIC and NSHDS validation studies (area under receiver-operating characteristics curve [AUC], sensitivity and specificity).
Results: In the validation study, an integrated risk-prediction model combining smoking exposure with the biomarker score yielded an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76-0.90) compared to 0.73 (95% CI: 0.64-0.82) for a model based on smoking exposure alone (P=0.003 for difference in AUC). At an overall specificity of 0.83 based on the USPSTF screening criteria, the sensitivity of the integrated risk-prediction model (biomarker) model was 0.63 compared to 0.43 for the smoking model. Conversely, at an overall sensitivity of 0.42 (USPSTF), the integrated risk-prediction model yielded a specificity of 0.95 compared to 0.86 for the smoking model.
Conclusions and Relevance: This study provided a proof-of-principle in demonstrating that a panel of circulating protein biomarkers can improve lung cancer risk assessment and may be used to define eligibility for CT-screening.
Date Issued
2018-10-11
Date Acceptance
2018-04-12
Citation
JAMA Oncology, 2018, 4 (10)
ISSN
2374-2445
Publisher
American Medical Association
Journal / Book Title
JAMA Oncology
Volume
4
Issue
10
Copyright Statement
© 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Oncology
TUMOR-MARKER
PREDICTION
MODELS
Integrative Analysis of Lung Cancer Etiology and Risk (INTEGRAL) Consortium for Early Detection of Lung Cancer
Publication Status
Published online
Article Number
e182078
Date Publish Online
2018-07-12