Global disparities in wellbeing from green infrastructure cooling services: a systematic review
File(s)
Published version
Author(s)
Han, Rui
Marchant, Robert
Thorn, Jessica
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
The escalation of urbanisation contributes significantly to climate change and exacerbates environmental, health and social disparities, especially affecting impoverished and vulnerable communities in the urban periphery. However, few studies contrast the global disparities in multiple wellbeing from inequitable green infrastructure (GI) and cooling perspectives. Through a combination of systematic literature review and hierarchical archetypal analysis, this study examines 95 out of 3864 initial articles focusing on the interplay between inequitable GI and disparate cooling services, and their emphasis on both subjective and objective wellbeing. Our findings highlight an increasing interest on this topic since 2009, with a notable surge post-2015 focused on the application of nature-based solutions for urban cooling and associated inequity. The literature review reveals 43 wellbeing thematic categories based on four dimensions, of which we identify characteristics: (1) the most affected vulnerable individuals often based on financial status, population density, and access to public facilities; (2) geographic areas where wellbeing effects are most pronounced, linked to building attributes and high-density impervious surfaces; (3) health implications highlighting physical ailments; and (4) perceptions of GI emphasising residents’ GI demand. Afterwards, hierarchical analysis generated clustered archetypes that Archetype I and III mostly filled in North American, Archetypes II in Asia, and IV across Europe, Asia, and North America, to underscore substantial variances and similarities in wellbeing categories across continents. These archetypes characterise global pathways to enhancing cooling for wellbeing, including Archetype I of integrating GI in urban planning, Archetype II of retrofitting infrastructure to improve GI interaction, Archetype III of connecting disadvantaged groups with heat management, and Archetype IV of fostering public involvement in decision-making processes. The study’s findings provide insights to narrow ecological injustices arising from GI and research direction for further in theoretical, technological, and practical investigations to optimize cooling and wellbeing.
Date Issued
2024-07-01
Date Acceptance
2024-05-18
Citation
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2024, 97
ISSN
1618-8667
Publisher
Elsevier
Journal / Book Title
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
Volume
97
Copyright Statement
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier GmbH. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
License URL
Subjects
Science & Technology
Social Sciences
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Plant Sciences
Environmental Studies
Forestry
Urban Studies
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Nature -based solutions
Environmental inequity
Sustainable Development Goals
Urbanisation
Hierarchical archetypal analysis
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
STREET GREENERY
URBAN
HEALTH
SPACE
VEGETATION
BENEFITS
METAANALYSES
TEMPERATURE
MECHANISMS
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
128372
Date Publish Online
2024-05-23