Repair of aortic regurgitation in young adults: sooner rather than later
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives: Establishing surgical criteria for aortic valve replacement (AVR) or repair in severe aortic regurgitation (AR) is challenging and evidence-based recommendations for young adults are lacking. We studied the indications for AVR in a cohort of young adults with severe AR from a tertiary centre, and the associated outcomes. The relation between pre-surgical echocardiographic parameters and post-operative left ventricular (LV) size and function, clinical events, and prosthetic valve-related complications was also investigated.
Methods: Data were collected retrospectively on consecutive adult patients who underwent AVR or repair for severe AR between 2005 and 2019 in a tertiary cardiac centre.
Results: One-hundred-and-seventy-two patients were included (age at surgery 29 [22-41] years, 81% male). One third were operated before meeting standard guideline indications. Normalization of LV size and function was achieved in 65% of patients. No significant change in LV ejection fraction (EF) from baseline to the latest follow-up (p=0.08) was observed. Pre-surgical LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD) was associated with lack of LV normalization post-surgery (OR per 1 cm increase 2.81, 95%CI:1.54 - 5.56, p<0.01). On ROC analysis, the cut-off for baseline LVESD that maximizes sensitivity and specificity for lack of LV normalization post-surgery was 43mm. Pre- and post-operative LV dimensions, and post-operative LVEF were predictors of clinical events during follow-up. Prosthesis-related complications were frequent (20.3%) during a follow-up of 5.6 [2.9-9.2] years. Freedom from aortic re-intervention was 98%, 96.5%, 85.4% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively.
Conclusions: Patients with a history of cardiac surgery and/or increased baseline LVESD are less likely to achieve normalization of LV size and function following AVR. Clinicians must carefully balance the potential benefits of AVR on long-term outcomes against the risk of periprocedural complications and the likelihood of future interventions, especially in younger patients.
Objectives: Establishing surgical criteria for aortic valve replacement (AVR) or repair in severe aortic regurgitation (AR) is challenging and evidence-based recommendations for young adults are lacking. We studied the indications for AVR in a cohort of young adults with severe AR from a tertiary centre, and the associated outcomes. The relation between pre-surgical echocardiographic parameters and post-operative left ventricular (LV) size and function, clinical events, and prosthetic valve-related complications was also investigated.
Methods: Data were collected retrospectively on consecutive adult patients who underwent AVR or repair for severe AR between 2005 and 2019 in a tertiary cardiac centre.
Results: One-hundred-and-seventy-two patients were included (age at surgery 29 [22-41] years, 81% male). One third were operated before meeting standard guideline indications. Normalization of LV size and function was achieved in 65% of patients. No significant change in LV ejection fraction (EF) from baseline to the latest follow-up (p=0.08) was observed. Pre-surgical LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD) was associated with lack of LV normalization post-surgery (OR per 1 cm increase 2.81, 95%CI:1.54 - 5.56, p<0.01). On ROC analysis, the cut-off for baseline LVESD that maximizes sensitivity and specificity for lack of LV normalization post-surgery was 43mm. Pre- and post-operative LV dimensions, and post-operative LVEF were predictors of clinical events during follow-up. Prosthesis-related complications were frequent (20.3%) during a follow-up of 5.6 [2.9-9.2] years. Freedom from aortic re-intervention was 98%, 96.5%, 85.4% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively.
Conclusions: Patients with a history of cardiac surgery and/or increased baseline LVESD are less likely to achieve normalization of LV size and function following AVR. Clinicians must carefully balance the potential benefits of AVR on long-term outcomes against the risk of periprocedural complications and the likelihood of future interventions, especially in younger patients.
Date Issued
2023-09-19
Date Acceptance
2023-07-31
Citation
Journal of the American Heart Association, 2023, 12 (18), pp.1-11
ISSN
2047-9980
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
1
End Page
11
Journal / Book Title
Journal of the American Heart Association
Volume
12
Issue
18
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Identifier
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.029251
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
e029251
Date Publish Online
2023-09-18