Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. Faculty of Medicine
  4. Enhanced Recovery After Bariatric Surgery (ERABS): Clinical Outcomes from a Tertiary Referral Bariatric Centre
 
  • Details
Enhanced Recovery After Bariatric Surgery (ERABS): Clinical Outcomes from a Tertiary Referral Bariatric Centre
File(s)
Enhanced Recovery After Bariatric Surgery (ERABS)- Clinical Outcomes from a Tertiary Referral Bariatric Centre..pdf (558.57 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Awad, S
Carter, S
Purkayastha, S
Hakky, S
Moorthy, K
more
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
There is paucity of data on Enhanced Recovery
After Bariatric Surgery (ERABS) protocols. This feasibility
study reports outcomes of this protocol utilized within a
tertiary-referral bariatric centre. Data on consecutive primary
procedures (laparoscopic gastric bypasses, sleeve gastrectomies
and gastric bands) performed over 9 months within an ERABS
protocol were prospectively recorded. Interventions utilized
included shortened preoperative fasts, intra-operative humidification,
early mobilization and feeding, avoidance of fluid overload,
incentive spirometry, use of prokinetics and laxatives.
Data collected included demographics, co-morbidities, morbidity,
mortality, length of stay (LOS) and re-admissions. A total of
226 procedures (age [mean ± SD], 45±11 years, median [interquartile
range] BMI 44.9 [41.0–49.0] kg/m2
) were undertaken:
150 (66 %) bypasses, 47 (21 %) sleeves and 29 (13 %)
bands. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea and limited
mobility were present in 40 %, 34 %, 24 % and 9 % of patients,
respectively. No anastomotic or staple line leaks/bleeds were
encountered. Ten (4.4 %) patients developed postoperative
morbidity (mainly respiratory complications). One death
occurred from massive pulmonary embolus in a high-risk patient
(despite insertion of preoperative-IVC filter). Respective
mean ± SD LOS for bypasses, sleeves and bands were 1.88±
1.12, 2.30±1.69 and 0.69±0.81 days. Successful discharge on
the first postoperative day was achieved in 37 % and 28 % of
bypasses and sleeves, respectively. Day-case gastric bands were
performed in 48 %. Thirty-day hospital re-admission occurred
in six (2.7 %) patients. Applying an ERABS protocol was
feasible, safe, associated with low morbidity, acceptable LOS
and low 30-day re-admission rates. The presence of multiple
medical co-morbidities should not preclude use of an ERABS
protocol within bariatric patients.
Date Issued
2014-05-01
Date Acceptance
2013-12-20
Citation
Obesity Surgery, 2014, 24 (5), pp.753-758
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/25832
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1151-4
ISSN
1708-0428
Publisher
Springer Verlag
Start Page
753
End Page
758
Journal / Book Title
Obesity Surgery
Volume
24
Issue
5
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2013. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the
source are credited.
License URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Surgery
SURGERY
Morbid obesity
Gastric bypass
Sleeve gastrectomy
Gastric band
Laparoscopic
Enhanced recovery
Fast track
Length of stay
Complications
Bariatric surgery
Co-morbidities
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS
PERIOPERATIVE CARE
COLORECTAL SURGERY
METAANALYSIS
Publication Status
Published
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback