Systemic chemotherapy as salvage treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer patients who fail to respond to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
The potential of chemotherapy as salvage treatment after failure of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has never been explored. We conducted a single‐center, retrospective analysis to address this question.
Patients and Methods
Patients with newly diagnosed LARC who were inoperable or candidates for extensive (i.e., beyond total mesorectal excision [TME]) surgery after long‐course chemoradiotherapy and who received salvage chemotherapy were included. The primary objective was to estimate the proportion of patients who became suitable for TME after chemotherapy.
Results
Forty‐five patients were eligible (39 candidates for extensive surgery and 6 unresectable). Previous radiotherapy was given concurrently with chemotherapy in 43 cases (median dose: 54.0 Gy). Oxaliplatin‐ and irinotecan‐based salvage chemotherapy was administered in 40 (88.9%) and 5 (11.1%) cases, respectively. Eight patients (17.8%) became suitable for TME after chemotherapy, 10 (22.2%) ultimately underwent TME with clear margins, and 2 (4.4%) were managed with a watch and wait approach. Additionally, 13 patients had extensive surgery with curative intent. Three‐year progression‐free survival and 5‐year overall survival in the entire population were 30.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.0–46.0) and 44.0% (95% CI: 26.0–61.0), respectively. For the curatively resected and “watch and wait” patients, these figures were 52.0% (95% CI: 27.0–73.0) and 67.0% (95% CI: 40.0–84.0), respectively.
Conclusion
Systemic chemotherapy may be an effective salvage strategy for LARC patients who fail to respond to chemoradiotherapy and are inoperable or candidates for beyond TME surgery. According to our study, one out of five patients may become resectable or be spared from an extensive surgery after systemic chemotherapy.
The potential of chemotherapy as salvage treatment after failure of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has never been explored. We conducted a single‐center, retrospective analysis to address this question.
Patients and Methods
Patients with newly diagnosed LARC who were inoperable or candidates for extensive (i.e., beyond total mesorectal excision [TME]) surgery after long‐course chemoradiotherapy and who received salvage chemotherapy were included. The primary objective was to estimate the proportion of patients who became suitable for TME after chemotherapy.
Results
Forty‐five patients were eligible (39 candidates for extensive surgery and 6 unresectable). Previous radiotherapy was given concurrently with chemotherapy in 43 cases (median dose: 54.0 Gy). Oxaliplatin‐ and irinotecan‐based salvage chemotherapy was administered in 40 (88.9%) and 5 (11.1%) cases, respectively. Eight patients (17.8%) became suitable for TME after chemotherapy, 10 (22.2%) ultimately underwent TME with clear margins, and 2 (4.4%) were managed with a watch and wait approach. Additionally, 13 patients had extensive surgery with curative intent. Three‐year progression‐free survival and 5‐year overall survival in the entire population were 30.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.0–46.0) and 44.0% (95% CI: 26.0–61.0), respectively. For the curatively resected and “watch and wait” patients, these figures were 52.0% (95% CI: 27.0–73.0) and 67.0% (95% CI: 40.0–84.0), respectively.
Conclusion
Systemic chemotherapy may be an effective salvage strategy for LARC patients who fail to respond to chemoradiotherapy and are inoperable or candidates for beyond TME surgery. According to our study, one out of five patients may become resectable or be spared from an extensive surgery after systemic chemotherapy.
Date Issued
2017-06
Date Acceptance
2017-01-03
Citation
The Oncologist, 2017, 22 (6), pp.728-736
ISSN
1083-7159
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Start Page
728
End Page
736
Journal / Book Title
The Oncologist
Volume
22
Issue
6
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2017 Oxford University Press. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Francesco Sclafani, Gina Brown, David Cunningham, Sheela Rao, Paris Tekkis, Diana Tait, Federica Morano, Chiara Baratelli, Eleftheria Kalaitzaki, Shahnawaz Rasheed, David Watkins, Naureen Starling, Andrew Wotherspoon, Ian Chau, Systemic Chemotherapy as Salvage Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Who Fail to Respond to Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, The Oncologist, Volume 22, Issue 6, June 2017, Pages 728–736,
is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0396
is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0396
Identifier
https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000403210700014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=a2bf6146997ec60c407a63945d4e92bb
Subjects
1ST-LINE TREATMENT
Beyond total mesorectal excision surgery
CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION
COLORECTAL-CANCER
FOLLOW-UP
GROWTH-FACTOR-RECEPTOR
Inoperable rectal cancer
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Locally advanced rectal cancer
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Oncology
PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY
RANDOMIZED PHASE-III
RAS MUTATIONS
Salvage systemic chemotherapy
Science & Technology
TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION
TUMOR RESPONSE
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2017-05-05