Perioperative management and anaesthetic considerations in pelvic exenterations using Delphi methodology: results from the PelvEx Collaborative
File(s)zraa055.pdf (193.44 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Kontovounisios, Christos
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: The multidisciplinary perioperative and anaesthetic management of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration (PE) is essential for good surgical outcomes. No clear guidelines have been established, and there is wide variation in clinical practice internationally. This consensus statement consolidates clinical experience and best practice collectively, and systematically addresses key domains in the perioperative and anaesthetic management.
Methods: The modified Delphi methodology was used to achieve consensus from the PelvEx Collaborative. The process included one round of online questionnaire involving controlled feedback and structured participant response, two rounds of editing, and one round of web-based voting. It was held from December 2019 to February 2020. Consensus was defined as more than 80 per cent agreement; whereas less than 80 per cent agreement indicated low consensus.
Results: The final consensus document contained 47 voted statements, across six key domains of perioperative and anaesthetic management in PEs comprising preoperative assessment and preparation, anaesthetic considerations, perioperative management, anticipating possible massive haemorrhage, stress response and postoperative critical care, and pain management.
Consensus recommendations were developed based on consensus agreement achieved on 34 statements.
Conclusion: The perioperative and anaesthetic management of PE patients is best accomplished by a dedicated multidisciplinary team with relevant domain expertise in the setting of a specialized tertiary unit. This consensus statement has addressed key domains within the framework of current perioperative and anaesthetic management among PE patients, with an international perspective, to guide clinical practice, and has outlined areas for future clinical research.
Methods: The modified Delphi methodology was used to achieve consensus from the PelvEx Collaborative. The process included one round of online questionnaire involving controlled feedback and structured participant response, two rounds of editing, and one round of web-based voting. It was held from December 2019 to February 2020. Consensus was defined as more than 80 per cent agreement; whereas less than 80 per cent agreement indicated low consensus.
Results: The final consensus document contained 47 voted statements, across six key domains of perioperative and anaesthetic management in PEs comprising preoperative assessment and preparation, anaesthetic considerations, perioperative management, anticipating possible massive haemorrhage, stress response and postoperative critical care, and pain management.
Consensus recommendations were developed based on consensus agreement achieved on 34 statements.
Conclusion: The perioperative and anaesthetic management of PE patients is best accomplished by a dedicated multidisciplinary team with relevant domain expertise in the setting of a specialized tertiary unit. This consensus statement has addressed key domains within the framework of current perioperative and anaesthetic management among PE patients, with an international perspective, to guide clinical practice, and has outlined areas for future clinical research.
Date Issued
2021-01
Date Acceptance
2020-11-15
Citation
BJS Open, 2021, 5 (1), pp.1-10
ISSN
2474-9842
Publisher
Wiley Open Access
Start Page
1
End Page
10
Journal / Book Title
BJS Open
Volume
5
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
License URL
Identifier
https://academic.oup.com/bjsopen/article/5/1/zraa055/6137382
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2021-02-15