Diagnostic accuracy of chest X-ray computer-aided detection software for detection of prevalent and incident tuberculosis in household contacts
File(s) ciae528.pdf (1.66 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
World Health Organization (WHO) tuberculosis (TB) screening guidelines recommend computer-aided detection (CAD) software for chest radiograph (CXR) interpretation. However, studies evaluating their diagnostic and prognostic accuracy are limited.
Methods
We conducted a prospective cohort study of household contacts of rifampicin-resistant TB in South Africa. Participants underwent baseline CXR and sputum investigation (routine [single spontaneous] and enhanced [additionally 2–3 induced]) for prevalent TB and follow-up for incident TB. Three CXR-CAD software products (CAD4TBv7.0, qXRv3.0.0, and Lunit INSIGHT v3.1.4.111) were compared. We evaluated their performance to detect routine and enhanced prevalent and incident TB, comparing performance with blood tests (Xpert MTB host-response, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, QuantiFERON) in a subgroup.
Results
483 participants were followed up for 4.6 years (median). There were 23 prevalent (7 routinely diagnosed) and 38 incident TB cases. The AUC ROCs (95% CIs) to identify prevalent TB for CAD4TBv7.0, qXRv3.0.0, and Lunit INSIGHT v3.1.4.111 were .87 (.77–.96), .88 (.79–.97), and .91 (.83–.99), respectively. More than 30% with scores above recommended CAD thresholds who were bacteriologically negative on routine baseline sputum were subsequently diagnosed by enhanced sputum investigation or during follow-up. The AUC performance of baseline CAD to identify incident cases ranged between .60 and .65. Diagnostic performance of CAD for prevalent TB was superior to blood testing.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that the potential of CAD-CXR screening for TB is not maximized as a high proportion of those above current thresholds, but with a negative routine confirmatory sputum, have true TB disease that may benefit intervention.
World Health Organization (WHO) tuberculosis (TB) screening guidelines recommend computer-aided detection (CAD) software for chest radiograph (CXR) interpretation. However, studies evaluating their diagnostic and prognostic accuracy are limited.
Methods
We conducted a prospective cohort study of household contacts of rifampicin-resistant TB in South Africa. Participants underwent baseline CXR and sputum investigation (routine [single spontaneous] and enhanced [additionally 2–3 induced]) for prevalent TB and follow-up for incident TB. Three CXR-CAD software products (CAD4TBv7.0, qXRv3.0.0, and Lunit INSIGHT v3.1.4.111) were compared. We evaluated their performance to detect routine and enhanced prevalent and incident TB, comparing performance with blood tests (Xpert MTB host-response, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, QuantiFERON) in a subgroup.
Results
483 participants were followed up for 4.6 years (median). There were 23 prevalent (7 routinely diagnosed) and 38 incident TB cases. The AUC ROCs (95% CIs) to identify prevalent TB for CAD4TBv7.0, qXRv3.0.0, and Lunit INSIGHT v3.1.4.111 were .87 (.77–.96), .88 (.79–.97), and .91 (.83–.99), respectively. More than 30% with scores above recommended CAD thresholds who were bacteriologically negative on routine baseline sputum were subsequently diagnosed by enhanced sputum investigation or during follow-up. The AUC performance of baseline CAD to identify incident cases ranged between .60 and .65. Diagnostic performance of CAD for prevalent TB was superior to blood testing.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that the potential of CAD-CXR screening for TB is not maximized as a high proportion of those above current thresholds, but with a negative routine confirmatory sputum, have true TB disease that may benefit intervention.
Date Issued
2025-03-15
Date Acceptance
2024-12-01
Citation
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2025, 80 (3), pp.626-636
ISSN
1058-4838
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Start Page
626
End Page
636
Journal / Book Title
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Volume
80
Issue
3
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
License URL
Identifier
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39692469
PII: 7925268
Subjects
active case finding
asymptomatic
chest X-ray
computer-aided detection
Immunology
Infectious Diseases
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Microbiology
PULMONARY TUBERCULOSIS
RADIOGRAPHY
Science & Technology
tuberculosis
Publication Status
Published
Coverage Spatial
United States
Date Publish Online
2024-12-18
