Insights into the tuberculosis diagnostic pathway
File(s)
Author(s)
Martin, Laura
Type
Thesis
Abstract
Background:
Early identification of patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is important. Existing first and second-line drug (SLD) susceptibility testing (DST) strategies can be slow, unreliable and inaccessible.
Methods and Findings:
SLD DST on the MODS platform (MODS+):
97 drug-naïve and on-treatment patients provided sputum samples for analysis by MODS+ for SLDs. Agreement of MODS+ results with proportions method was >80% for fluoroquinolones and second-line injectables but suboptimal for ethambutol, pyrazinamide, streptomycin, cycloserine, ciprofloxacin and ethionamide.
Performance of MODS kit for TB and multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-TB) diagnosis:
Sputum samples (N=2446) were cultured in parallel by standard methods and MODS kit. Compared to conventional MODS, MODS kit sensitivity and specificity for TB detection was 99.3% (95%CI:98.3-99.8%) and 99.0% (95%CI:97.8-99.6%) respectively, for detection of rifampicin resistance 98.9% (95%CI:94.2-100.0%) and 99.0% (95%CI:97.8-99.6%) respectively and for detection of isoniazid resistance 96.0% (95%CI:90.8-98.7%) and 99.5% (95%CI:98.4-99.9%) respectively.
Can changes in culture time to detection of TB (TTD-TB) predict MDR-TB?
95 patients provided sequential sputum samples before and during treatment for culture by MODS. TTD-TB increased during treatment but TTD-TB distribution at each time point did not differ between MDR and drug-susceptible strains (p=0.4, during eight weeks first-line treatment).
Should TB DSTs be rationed to “high risk” TB suspects?
Clinico-epidemiological data from TB suspects (N=1545) underwent multivariate analysis for DR-TB predictors. 17 selective testing strategies were based on significant predictors and international guidelines. The proportions of DR-TB patients captured by each strategy were calculated.
147 patients had culture-positive TB (DR-TB, n=31). If only those with a MDR-TB risk factor were tested 53·1% of DR-TB patients would not have undergone DST. Most strategies performed similarly poorly or tested 80% of the population to detect 90% of DR-TB patients.
Conclusion:
The MODS+ assay and MODS kit are promising diagnostic tools, likely to aid important universal access to early TB DST.
Early identification of patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is important. Existing first and second-line drug (SLD) susceptibility testing (DST) strategies can be slow, unreliable and inaccessible.
Methods and Findings:
SLD DST on the MODS platform (MODS+):
97 drug-naïve and on-treatment patients provided sputum samples for analysis by MODS+ for SLDs. Agreement of MODS+ results with proportions method was >80% for fluoroquinolones and second-line injectables but suboptimal for ethambutol, pyrazinamide, streptomycin, cycloserine, ciprofloxacin and ethionamide.
Performance of MODS kit for TB and multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-TB) diagnosis:
Sputum samples (N=2446) were cultured in parallel by standard methods and MODS kit. Compared to conventional MODS, MODS kit sensitivity and specificity for TB detection was 99.3% (95%CI:98.3-99.8%) and 99.0% (95%CI:97.8-99.6%) respectively, for detection of rifampicin resistance 98.9% (95%CI:94.2-100.0%) and 99.0% (95%CI:97.8-99.6%) respectively and for detection of isoniazid resistance 96.0% (95%CI:90.8-98.7%) and 99.5% (95%CI:98.4-99.9%) respectively.
Can changes in culture time to detection of TB (TTD-TB) predict MDR-TB?
95 patients provided sequential sputum samples before and during treatment for culture by MODS. TTD-TB increased during treatment but TTD-TB distribution at each time point did not differ between MDR and drug-susceptible strains (p=0.4, during eight weeks first-line treatment).
Should TB DSTs be rationed to “high risk” TB suspects?
Clinico-epidemiological data from TB suspects (N=1545) underwent multivariate analysis for DR-TB predictors. 17 selective testing strategies were based on significant predictors and international guidelines. The proportions of DR-TB patients captured by each strategy were calculated.
147 patients had culture-positive TB (DR-TB, n=31). If only those with a MDR-TB risk factor were tested 53·1% of DR-TB patients would not have undergone DST. Most strategies performed similarly poorly or tested 80% of the population to detect 90% of DR-TB patients.
Conclusion:
The MODS+ assay and MODS kit are promising diagnostic tools, likely to aid important universal access to early TB DST.
Version
Open Access
Date Issued
2014-02
Date Awarded
2014-06
Copyright Statement
Attribution NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-ND)
Advisor
Friedland, Jon
Moore, David
Sponsor
PATH
Wellcome Trust (London, England)
Publisher Department
Department of Medicine
Publisher Institution
Imperial College London
Qualification Level
Doctoral
Qualification Name
Doctor of Medicine (Research) MD (Res)