A dual-phase machine learning framework for paediatric ventilator liberation: forecasting extubation readiness and nowcasting extubation outcomes
File(s)Readiness_Figures_20251021_BMJ_Revision2.pdf (597.43 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Liu, Edison
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Importance</jats:title><jats:p>Determining the optimal timing for extubation in critically ill children remains challenging, with premature extubation leading to increased morbidity and mortality, while prolonged ventilation exposes patients to ventilator-associated complications.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To develop and validate machine learning models for dynamic assessment of extubation failure risk (nowcasting) and extubation readiness (forecasting) in mechanically ventilated children.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants</jats:title><jats:p>Retrospective cohort study using electronic health records from two pediatric intensive care units in London, UK (2013-2022), including 3,815 ventilation episodes in children aged 0-17 years.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Exposure(s)</jats:title><jats:p>Mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube using pressure control-BIPAP (PC) or spontaneous pressure support CPAP (PS) modes.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Main outcomes and measures</jats:title><jats:p>Primary outcomes were extubation failure (requiring reintubation within 48 hours) and extubation readiness (successful extubation within 12 hours). Both models incorporated demographic, physiological, ventilation, and medication data, with varying historical context lengths to optimize prediction accuracy.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The median age of children in the study cohort (n=3815 ventilation episodes) was 8.0 months (56.2% male); extubation failure occurred in 315/3815 (8.3%). The nowcasting model achieved an area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.77. The forecasting model reached an AUROC of 0.85. Ventilation parameters dominated the nowcasting model, while medication response and patient characteristics drove the forecasting model.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance</jats:title><jats:p>Our dual-model approach offers a structured framework for extubation decision-making in critically ill children, combining continuous monitoring of readiness with snapshot assessment of extubation failure risk. Prospective validation is needed; however, this strategy may help clinicians optimize the timing of ventilation liberation within pediatric intensive care.</jats:p></jats:sec>
Date Issued
2025-02-07
Date Acceptance
2025-11-11
Citation
BMJ Digital Health & AI
ISSN
3049-575X
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal / Book Title
BMJ Digital Health & AI
Copyright Statement
Copyright This paper is embargoed until publication. Once published the author’s accepted manuscript will be made available under a CC-BY License in accordance with Imperial’s Research Publications Open Access policy (www.imperial.ac.uk/oa-policy).
Publication Status
Accepted