Multilateral funding for health adaptation and the health co-benefits of climate mitigation: an observational study
File(s)
Published version
Author(s)
Pinho-Gomes, Ana-Catarina
Jamart, Louis
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
The health impacts of climate change have been increasingly recognised for the past years. However, it remains unclear how this has translated into funding for health adaptation and health co-benefits of climate mitigation.
Methods
We analysed the projects funded by the Green Climate Fund (GCF) between 2021 and 2023 and the Adaptation Fund between 2019 and 2024 to estimate the amount of funding provided for health adaptation and the health co-benefits of climate mitigation. Based on the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index (ND-GAIN), we estimated adaptation vulnerability and readiness for each country and investigated the association between this index and the total adaptation funding received by each country.
Findings
Between 2021 and 2023, 85 projects were funded by the GCF, of which 37 were adaptation, 32 cross-cutting, and 16 mitigation projects. The funds provided by the GCF contributed US$764 million to health adaptation (US$178 million in 2021 to US$422 million in 2023). There was no association between the amount of funding provided by the GCF towards adaptation and the estimated vulnerability, resilience, and combined adaptation index (ND-GAIN) at country level. Among the 48 mitigation and cross-cutting projects, 15 did not mention health, 13 mislabelled health co-benefits, 11 identified specific health co-benefits, and 9 correctly identified and measured health co-benefits as outcomes. The main health co-benefits were reduction in the health impact of air pollution, improved nutrition, and reduction in traffic casualties. There were 15 active projects on the Adaptation Fund website, amounting to a total of US$51,944,915. Seven of the projects mentioned health benefits but only one explicitly measured health adaptation indicators as outcomes.
Interpretation
Funding for health adaptation and health co-benefits of mitigation provided by the two main multilateral adaptation funds has been increasing over the recent years. However, it remains insufficient and does not seem to be targeting the countries facing the greatest impacts of climate change.
The health impacts of climate change have been increasingly recognised for the past years. However, it remains unclear how this has translated into funding for health adaptation and health co-benefits of climate mitigation.
Methods
We analysed the projects funded by the Green Climate Fund (GCF) between 2021 and 2023 and the Adaptation Fund between 2019 and 2024 to estimate the amount of funding provided for health adaptation and the health co-benefits of climate mitigation. Based on the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index (ND-GAIN), we estimated adaptation vulnerability and readiness for each country and investigated the association between this index and the total adaptation funding received by each country.
Findings
Between 2021 and 2023, 85 projects were funded by the GCF, of which 37 were adaptation, 32 cross-cutting, and 16 mitigation projects. The funds provided by the GCF contributed US$764 million to health adaptation (US$178 million in 2021 to US$422 million in 2023). There was no association between the amount of funding provided by the GCF towards adaptation and the estimated vulnerability, resilience, and combined adaptation index (ND-GAIN) at country level. Among the 48 mitigation and cross-cutting projects, 15 did not mention health, 13 mislabelled health co-benefits, 11 identified specific health co-benefits, and 9 correctly identified and measured health co-benefits as outcomes. The main health co-benefits were reduction in the health impact of air pollution, improved nutrition, and reduction in traffic casualties. There were 15 active projects on the Adaptation Fund website, amounting to a total of US$51,944,915. Seven of the projects mentioned health benefits but only one explicitly measured health adaptation indicators as outcomes.
Interpretation
Funding for health adaptation and health co-benefits of mitigation provided by the two main multilateral adaptation funds has been increasing over the recent years. However, it remains insufficient and does not seem to be targeting the countries facing the greatest impacts of climate change.
Date Issued
2024-12
Date Acceptance
2024-11-27
Citation
Environment International, 2024, 194
ISSN
0160-4120
Publisher
Elsevier
Journal / Book Title
Environment International
Volume
194
Copyright Statement
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
License URL
Identifier
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.109172
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
109172
Date Publish Online
2024-12-02