Energy consumption for desalination - a comparison of forward osmosis with reverse osmosis, and the potential for perfect membranes
Author(s)
Mazlan, NM
Peshev, D
Livingston, AG
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Reverse osmosis (RO) is now the most ubiquitous technology for desalination, with numerous seawater RO
plants being built in water-stressed countries to complement existing water resources. Despite the development
of highly permeable RO membranes, energy consumption remains a major contributor to total cost. Forward osmosis
(FO) is receiving much attention as a potentially lower energy alternative to RO. However, the draw solution
(DS) recovery step in FO requires significant energy consumption. The present study is a modelling
approach, simulating FO and RO desalination under various process conditions and process flow schemes
using the Aspen Plus environment. Results suggest that there is practically no difference in specific energy consumption
(SEC) between standalone RO, and FO with nanofiltration (NF) DS recovery; this can be generalised for
any pressure-driven membrane process used for the DS recovery stage in a hybrid FO process. Furthermore, even
if any or all of the membranes considered, FO, RO or NF, were perfect (i.e. had infinite permeance and 100%
rejection), it would not change the SEC significantly. Hence, any advantage possessed by the FO with NF recovery
process derives from the lower fouling propensity of FO, which may reduce or eliminate the need for pretreatment
and chemical cleaning
plants being built in water-stressed countries to complement existing water resources. Despite the development
of highly permeable RO membranes, energy consumption remains a major contributor to total cost. Forward osmosis
(FO) is receiving much attention as a potentially lower energy alternative to RO. However, the draw solution
(DS) recovery step in FO requires significant energy consumption. The present study is a modelling
approach, simulating FO and RO desalination under various process conditions and process flow schemes
using the Aspen Plus environment. Results suggest that there is practically no difference in specific energy consumption
(SEC) between standalone RO, and FO with nanofiltration (NF) DS recovery; this can be generalised for
any pressure-driven membrane process used for the DS recovery stage in a hybrid FO process. Furthermore, even
if any or all of the membranes considered, FO, RO or NF, were perfect (i.e. had infinite permeance and 100%
rejection), it would not change the SEC significantly. Hence, any advantage possessed by the FO with NF recovery
process derives from the lower fouling propensity of FO, which may reduce or eliminate the need for pretreatment
and chemical cleaning
Date Issued
2015-09-24
Date Acceptance
2015-08-17
Citation
Desalination, 2015, 377, pp.138-151
ISSN
0011-9164
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
138
End Page
151
Journal / Book Title
Desalination
Volume
377
Copyright Statement
© 2015, Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Subjects
Science & Technology
Technology
Physical Sciences
Engineering, Chemical
Water Resources
Engineering
Desalination
Energy consumption
Forward osmosis
Reverse osmosis
Membrane processes
SPIRAL-WOUND MODULES
INTERNAL CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION
WATER DESALINATION
COST OPTIMIZATION
SELECTIVE LAYER
PERFORMANCE
RO
FLUX
SIMULATION
SYSTEMS
Chemical Engineering
03 Chemical Sciences
09 Engineering
Publication Status
Published