Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • About
  • Communities & Collections
  • Advanced Search
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. School of Public Health
  4. School of Public Health
  5. Simplified hypertension screening methods across 60 countries: An observational study
 
  • Details
Simplified hypertension screening methods across 60 countries: An observational study
File(s)
journal.pmed.1003975.pdf (1.99 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Carrillo Larco, Rodrigo
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background
Simplified blood pressure (BP) screening approaches have been proposed. However, evidence is limited to a few countries and has not documented the cardiovascular risk amongst missed hypertension cases, limiting the uptake of these simplified approaches. We quantified the proportion of missed, over-diagnosed, and consistently identified hypertension cases and the 10-year cardiovascular risk in these groups.

Methods and findings
We used 60 WHO STEPS surveys (cross-sectional and nationally representative; n = 145,174) conducted in 60 countries in 6 world regions between 2004 and 2019. Nine simplified approaches were compared against the standard (average of the last 2 of 3 BP measurements). The 10-year cardiovascular risk was computed with the 2019 World Health Organization Cardiovascular Risk Charts. We used t tests to compare the cardiovascular risk between the missed and over-diagnosed cases and the consistent hypertension cases. We used Poisson multilevel regressions to identify risk factors for missed cases (adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and 10-year cardiovascular risk). Across all countries, compared to the standard approach, the simplified approach that missed the fewest cases was using the second BP reading if the first BP reading was 130–145/80–95 mm Hg (5.62%); using only the second BP reading missed 5.80%. The simplified approach with the smallest over-diagnosis proportion was using the second BP reading if the first BP measurement was ≥140/90 mm Hg (3.03%). In many countries, cardiovascular risk was not significantly different between the missed and consistent hypertension groups, yet the mean was slightly lower amongst missed cases. Cardiovascular risk was positively associated with missed hypertension depending on the simplified approach. The main limitation of the work is the cross-sectional design.

Conclusions
Simplified BP screening approaches seem to have low misdiagnosis rates, and cardiovascular risk could be lower amongst missed cases than amongst consistent hypertension cases. Simplified BP screening approaches could be included in large screening programmes and busy clinics.
Date Issued
2022-04-01
Date Acceptance
2022-03-24
Citation
PLoS Medicine, 2022, 19 (4), pp.1-19
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/96111
URL
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003975
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003975
ISSN
1549-1277
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Start Page
1
End Page
19
Journal / Book Title
PLoS Medicine
Volume
19
Issue
4
Copyright Statement
© 2022 Carrillo-Larco et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
License URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Sponsor
Wellcome Trust
Identifier
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003975
Grant Number
214185/Z/18/Z
Subjects
General & Internal Medicine
11 Medical and Health Sciences
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2022-04-01
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback