Mapping storm spatial profiles for flood impact assessments
File(s)1-s2.0-S0309170822001282-main.pdf (3.86 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Synthetic design storms are often used to plan new drainage systems or assess flood impacts on infrastructure.
To simulate extreme rainfall events under climate change, design storms can be modified to match a different
return frequency of extreme rainfall events as well as a modified temporal distribution of rainfall intensities.
However, the same magnitude of change to the rainfall intensities is often applied in space. Several hydrological
applications are limited by this. Climate change impacts on urban pluvial floods, for example, require the use
of 2D design storms (rainfall fields) at sub-kilometer and sub-hourly scales. Recent kilometer scale climate
models, also known as convection-permitting climate models (CPM), provide rainfall outputs at a high spatial
resolution, although rainfall simulations are still restricted to a limited number of climate scenarios and time
periods. We nevertheless explored the potential use of rainfall data obtained from these models for hydrological
flood impact studies by introducing a method of spatial quantile mapping (SQM). To demonstrate the new
methodology, we extracted high-resolution rainfall simulations from a CPM for four domains representing
different urban areas in Switzerland. Extreme storms that are plausible under the present climate conditions
were simulated with a 2D stochastic rainfall model. Based on the CPM-informed stochastically generated
rainfall fields, we modified the design storms to fit the future climate scenario using three different methods:
the SQM, a uniform quantile mapping, and a uniform adjustment based on a rainfall–temperature relationship.
Throughout all storms, the temporal distribution of rainfall was the same. Using a flood model, we assessed
the impact of different rainfall adjustment methods on urban flooding. Significant differences were found in
the flood water depths and areas between the three methods. In general, the SQM method results in a higher
flood impact than the storms that were modified otherwise. The results suggest that spatial storm profiles may
need to be re-adjusted when assessing flood impacts
To simulate extreme rainfall events under climate change, design storms can be modified to match a different
return frequency of extreme rainfall events as well as a modified temporal distribution of rainfall intensities.
However, the same magnitude of change to the rainfall intensities is often applied in space. Several hydrological
applications are limited by this. Climate change impacts on urban pluvial floods, for example, require the use
of 2D design storms (rainfall fields) at sub-kilometer and sub-hourly scales. Recent kilometer scale climate
models, also known as convection-permitting climate models (CPM), provide rainfall outputs at a high spatial
resolution, although rainfall simulations are still restricted to a limited number of climate scenarios and time
periods. We nevertheless explored the potential use of rainfall data obtained from these models for hydrological
flood impact studies by introducing a method of spatial quantile mapping (SQM). To demonstrate the new
methodology, we extracted high-resolution rainfall simulations from a CPM for four domains representing
different urban areas in Switzerland. Extreme storms that are plausible under the present climate conditions
were simulated with a 2D stochastic rainfall model. Based on the CPM-informed stochastically generated
rainfall fields, we modified the design storms to fit the future climate scenario using three different methods:
the SQM, a uniform quantile mapping, and a uniform adjustment based on a rainfall–temperature relationship.
Throughout all storms, the temporal distribution of rainfall was the same. Using a flood model, we assessed
the impact of different rainfall adjustment methods on urban flooding. Significant differences were found in
the flood water depths and areas between the three methods. In general, the SQM method results in a higher
flood impact than the storms that were modified otherwise. The results suggest that spatial storm profiles may
need to be re-adjusted when assessing flood impacts
Date Issued
2022-08
Date Acceptance
2022-06-19
Citation
Advances in Water Resources, 2022, 166, pp.104258-104258
ISSN
0309-1708
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Start Page
104258
End Page
104258
Journal / Book Title
Advances in Water Resources
Volume
166
Copyright Statement
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
License URL
Sponsor
Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
Identifier
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309170822001282?via%3Dihub
Grant Number
NE/S003495/1
Subjects
Environmental Engineering
0102 Applied Mathematics
0905 Civil Engineering
0907 Environmental Engineering
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
104258