Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Engineering
  3. Chemical Engineering
  4. Chemical Engineering
  5. A pilot study of aortic hemodynamics before and after thoracic endovascular repair with a double-branched endograft
 
  • Details
A pilot study of aortic hemodynamics before and after thoracic endovascular repair with a double-branched endograft
File(s)
Zhu et al 2020.pdf (7.65 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Zhu, Yu
Zhan, Wenbo
Hamady, Mohamad
Xu, Xiao Yun
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Branched endografts have been developed to treat complex pathology in the aortic arch and ascending aorta. This study aims to evaluate the haemodynamic performance of a double-branched thoracic endograft by detailed comparison of flow patterns and wall shear stress in the aorta and supra-aortic branches before and after stent-graft implantation. Pre- and post-intervention CT images were acquired from two patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a double-branched endograft for thoracic aortic aneurysms. These images were used to reconstruct patient-specific models, which were analysed using computational fluid dynamics employing physiologically realistic boundary conditions. Our results showed that there was sufficient blood perfusion through the arch branches. The presence of inner tunnels caused flow derangement and asymmetric wall shear stress in the ascending aorta, where shear range index was up to 6 times higher than in the pre-intervention model. Wall shear stress in the aortic arch increased considerably after intervention as a result of accelerated flow. The maximum flow-induced displacement forces on the branched endografts were around 22 ​N for both patients, which was below the threshold for device migration. Results from this pilot study demonstrated that aortic flow patterns were significantly altered by the branched endograft which caused increased spatial variation of wall shear stress in the ascending aorta and the arch. Although no obvious adverse hemodynamic features were found immediately after intervention for the cases we analysed, follow-up studies will be needed to assess durability of the device.
Date Issued
2020-01-22
Date Acceptance
2019-12-26
Citation
Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices, 2020, 4, pp.1-17
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/87258
URL
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590093520300011?via%3Dihub
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medntd.2020.100027
ISSN
2590-0935
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Start Page
1
End Page
17
Journal / Book Title
Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices
Volume
4
Copyright Statement
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
License URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Identifier
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590093520300011?via%3Dihub
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
100027
Date Publish Online
2020-01-22
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback