Stochastic idiosyncratic cash flow risk and real options: implications for stock returns
File(s)Idiosyncratic_2016_11_03_Final.pdf (1.01 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Bhamra, HS
Shim, K
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility perform poorly relative to low idiosyncratic volatility
stocks. We o
↵
er a novel explanation of this anomaly based on real options, which is consistent
with earlier findings on idiosyncratic volatility (the positive contemporaneous relation between
firm-level stock returns and idiosyncratic volatility). Our approach is based on introducing
stochastic idiosyncratic cash flow risk into an equity valuation model of firms with growth
options. Within our model, a firm’s systematic risk depends on the delta of its growth op-
tion. The growth option’s delta is lower when idiosyncratic volatility rises, driving down the
firm’s systematic risk and hence its expected return – firms with higher idiosyncratic volatility
therefore have lower expected returns. Our model additionally o
↵
ers the following novel em-
pirical predictions: (i) returns correlate positively with idiosyncratic volatility during intervals
between large changes in idiosyncratic volatility (the switch e
↵
ect), and (ii) the anomalies
and the switch e
↵
ect are stronger for firms with more real options and which undergo larger
changes in idiosyncratic volatility. Empirical results support the predictions of our model.
stocks. We o
↵
er a novel explanation of this anomaly based on real options, which is consistent
with earlier findings on idiosyncratic volatility (the positive contemporaneous relation between
firm-level stock returns and idiosyncratic volatility). Our approach is based on introducing
stochastic idiosyncratic cash flow risk into an equity valuation model of firms with growth
options. Within our model, a firm’s systematic risk depends on the delta of its growth op-
tion. The growth option’s delta is lower when idiosyncratic volatility rises, driving down the
firm’s systematic risk and hence its expected return – firms with higher idiosyncratic volatility
therefore have lower expected returns. Our model additionally o
↵
ers the following novel em-
pirical predictions: (i) returns correlate positively with idiosyncratic volatility during intervals
between large changes in idiosyncratic volatility (the switch e
↵
ect), and (ii) the anomalies
and the switch e
↵
ect are stronger for firms with more real options and which undergo larger
changes in idiosyncratic volatility. Empirical results support the predictions of our model.
Date Issued
2017-01-11
Date Acceptance
2016-11-25
Citation
Journal of Economic Theory, 2017, 168, pp.400-431
ISSN
0022-0531
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
400
End Page
431
Journal / Book Title
Journal of Economic Theory
Volume
168
Copyright Statement
© 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Subjects
Social Sciences
Economics
Business & Economics
Asset pricing
Stock return and idiosyncratic volatility
Real options
Stochastic volatility
Regime-switching
Mixed jump-diffusion
ASSET PRICE DYNAMICS
CROSS-SECTION
IRREVERSIBLE INVESTMENT
CORPORATE-INVESTMENT
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
SECURITY RETURNS
FIRM
PERFORMANCE
UNCERTAINTY
VOLATILITY
Economic Theory
1401 Economic Theory
Publication Status
Published