Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Medicine
  3. Department of Surgery and Cancer
  4. Department of Surgery and Cancer
  5. A corticosteroid-eluting sinus implant following endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a UK-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
 
  • Details
A corticosteroid-eluting sinus implant following endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: a UK-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
File(s)
A Corticosteroid-Eluting Sinus Implant Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis A UK-Based Cost-Effecti.pdf (915.04 KB)
Published version
Author(s)
Javanbakht, Mehdi
Saleh, Hesham
Hemami, Mohsen Rezaei
Branagan-Harris, Michael
Boiano, Margaret
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is one of the commonest chronic health problems among adults in the UK. Around 15% of CRS patients undergo functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) annually after failing medical treatment. However, as incomplete resolution of symptoms or complications post-operatively is common, the post-operative management is considered to be as important as the surgery itself. A bioabsorbable corticosteroid-eluting sinus implant (CESI) (Propel®, mometasone furoate 370 µg) has been used as an alternative post-FESS treatment. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of the corticosteroid-eluting implant versus non-corticosteroid-eluting spacer following FESS for treatment of patients with CRS. METHODS: A decision tree model was developed to estimate the cost and effectiveness in each strategy. Costs and effects were estimated from a UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services perspective over a 6-month time horizon. Model pathways and parameters were informed by existing clinical guidelines and literature and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore uncertainties in base-case assumptions. RESULTS: Over a 6-month time horizon, inserting CESI at the end of FESS is less costly (£4646 vs. £4655 per patient) and is the more effective intervention [total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 6 months 0.443 vs. 0.444] than non-corticosteroid-eluting spacers; hence, it is a dominant strategy. The probabilistic analysis results indicate that CESI following FESS has a 62% probability of being cost effective at the £20,000/per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold and 56% probability of being a cost-saving intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CESI after FESS results in fewer post-operative complications than non-corticosteroid-eluting implants and may be a cost-saving technology over a 6-month time horizon. Although the cost of initial treatment with the CESI is greater, cost savings are made due to a reduction in the number of complications experienced.
Date Issued
2020-12
Date Acceptance
2020-02-01
Citation
PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2020, 4 (4), pp.679-686
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/98090
URL
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41669-020-00198-8
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00198-8
ISSN
2509-4254
Publisher
Springer
Start Page
679
End Page
686
Journal / Book Title
PharmacoEconomics - Open
Volume
4
Issue
4
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
License URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Identifier
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32048233
PII: 10.1007/s41669-020-00198-8
Publication Status
Published
Coverage Spatial
Switzerland
Date Publish Online
2020-02-12
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback