Argumentation for reasoning with conflicting clinical guidelines and preferences
File(s)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Cyras, Kristijonas
Oliveira, Tiago
Type
Conference Paper
Abstract
We propose to use two structured argumentation formalisms,
assumption-driven ABA
+
and goal-driven ASPIC-G, to en-
able automated patient-centric medical reasoning with inter-
acting clinical guideline recommendations, patient-specific
conditions and preferences over recommendations and goals.
assumption-driven ABA
+
and goal-driven ASPIC-G, to en-
able automated patient-centric medical reasoning with inter-
acting clinical guideline recommendations, patient-specific
conditions and preferences over recommendations and goals.
Date Issued
2018-09-24
Date Acceptance
2018-08-10
Citation
Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 2018
ISBN
978-1-57735-803-9
Publisher
AAAI
Journal / Book Title
Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
Copyright Statement
© 2018, Association for the Advancement of Artificial
Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.
Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.
Sponsor
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Identifier
https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/KR/KR18/paper/view/18022
Grant Number
EP/P029558/1
Source
16th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
Subjects
Science & Technology
Technology
Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science, Theory & Methods
Logic
Computer Science
Science & Technology - Other Topics
FRAMEWORK
Publication Status
Published
Start Date
2018-10-29
Finish Date
2018-11-02
Coverage Spatial
Tempe, Arizona, USA
Date Publish Online
2018-09-24