Laying the foundation for genomically-based risk assessment in chronic myeloid leukemia.
File(s)Final CML NGS 11.4.19.docx (340.44 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Outcomes for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have substantially improved due to advances in drug development and rational treatment intervention strategies. Despite these significant advances there are still unanswered questions on patient management regarding how to more reliably predict treatment failure at the time of diagnosis and how to select frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for optimal outcome. The BCR-ABL1 transcript level at diagnosis has no established prognostic impact and cannot guide frontline TKI selection. BCR-ABL1 mutations are detected in ~50% of TKI resistant patients but are rarely responsible for primary resistance. Other resistance mechanisms are largely uncharacterized and there are no other routine molecular testing strategies to facilitate the evaluation and further stratification of TKI resistance. Advances in next-generation sequencing technology has aided the management of a growing number of other malignancies, enabling the incorporation of somatic mutation profiles in diagnosis, classification, and prognostication. A largely unexplored area in CML research is whether expanded genomic analysis at diagnosis, resistance, and disease transformation can enhance patient management decisions, as has occurred for other cancers. The aim of this article is to review publications that reported mutated cancer-associated genes in CML patients at various disease phases. We discuss the frequency and type of such variants at initial diagnosis and at the time of treatment failure and transformation. Current limitations in the evaluation of mutants and recommendations for future reporting are outlined. The collective evaluation of mutational studies over more than a decade suggests a limited set of cancer-associated genes are indeed recurrently mutated in CML and some at a relatively high frequency. Genomic studies have the potential to lay the foundation for improved diagnostic risk classification according to clinical and genomic risk, and to enable more precise early identification of TKI resistance.
Date Issued
2019-08
Date Acceptance
2019-04-23
Citation
Leukemia, 2019, 33 (8), pp.1835-1850
ISSN
0887-6924
Publisher
Springer Nature
Start Page
1835
End Page
1850
Journal / Book Title
Leukemia
Volume
33
Issue
8
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2019. The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0512-y
Identifier
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31209280
PII: 10.1038/s41375-019-0512-y
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Oncology
Hematology
CHRONIC MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA
JOINT-CONSENSUS-RECOMMENDATION
PROTEIN FAMILIES DATABASE
SMALL-MOLECULE INHIBITOR
BCR-ABL MUTATIONS
BLAST CRISIS
SOMATIC MUTATIONS
CLONAL EVOLUTION
CHRONIC-PHASE
CYTOGENETIC RESPONSE
Genes, Neoplasm
Hematopoiesis
Humans
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive
Mutation
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
Repressor Proteins
Risk Assessment
International CML Foundation Genomics Alliance
Humans
Repressor Proteins
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
Risk Assessment
Hematopoiesis
Mutation
Genes, Neoplasm
Protein-Tyrosine Kinases
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive
1103 Clinical Sciences
1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Immunology
Publication Status
Published
Coverage Spatial
England
Date Publish Online
2019-06-17