Therapeutic alliance and rapport modulate responses to psilocybin assisted therapy for depression
File(s) fphar-12-788155.pdf (1.41 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: Across psychotherapeutic frameworks, the strength of the therapeutic alliance has been found to correlate with treatment outcomes; however, its role has never been formally assessed in a trial of psychedelic-assisted therapy. We aimed to investigate the relationships between therapeutic alliance and rapport, the quality of the acute psychedelic experience and treatment outcomes.
Methods: This 2-arm double-blind randomized controlled trial compared escitalopram with psychedelic-assisted therapy for moderate-severe depressive disorder (N=59). This analysis focused on the psilocybin condition (n=30), who received two oral doses of 25 mg psilocybin, three-weeks apart, with psychological preparation, in-session support, and integration therapy. A new psychedelic therapy model, called ‘Accept-Connect-Embody’ (ACE), was developed in this trial. The primary outcome was depression severity six weeks post treatment (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, QIDS-SR-16). Path analyses tested the hypothesis that therapeutic alliance (Scale To Assess the Therapeutic Relationship Patient Version, STAR-P) would predict depression
outcomes via its influence on the acute psychedelic experience, specifically emotional-breakthrough (EBI) and mystical-type experiences (MEQ). The same analysis was performed on the escitalopram
arm to test specificity.
Results: The strength of therapeutic alliance predicted pre-session rapport, greater emotional-breakthrough and mystical-type experience (maximum EBI and MEQ scores across the two psilocybin sessions) and final QIDS scores (β = -0.22, R2 = 0.42 for EBIMax; β = -0.19, R2 = 0.32 for
MEQMax). Exploratory path models revealed that final depression outcomes were more strongly affected by emotional breakthrough during the first, and mystical experience during the second session. Emotional breakthrough, but not mystical experience, during the first session had a positive effect on therapeutic alliance ahead of the second session (β = 0.79, p < .0001). Therapeutic alliance ahead of the second session had a direct impact on final depression scores, not mediated by the acute
experience, with a weaker alliance ahead of the second psilocybin session predicting higher absolute depression scores at endpoint (β = -0.49, p < .001).
Discussion: Future research could consider therapist training and characteristics; specific participant factors, e.g., attachment style or interpersonal trauma, which may underlie the quality of the therapeutic relationship, the psychedelic experience and clinical outcomes; and consider how therapeutic approaches might adapt in cases of weaker therapeutic alliance.
Methods: This 2-arm double-blind randomized controlled trial compared escitalopram with psychedelic-assisted therapy for moderate-severe depressive disorder (N=59). This analysis focused on the psilocybin condition (n=30), who received two oral doses of 25 mg psilocybin, three-weeks apart, with psychological preparation, in-session support, and integration therapy. A new psychedelic therapy model, called ‘Accept-Connect-Embody’ (ACE), was developed in this trial. The primary outcome was depression severity six weeks post treatment (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, QIDS-SR-16). Path analyses tested the hypothesis that therapeutic alliance (Scale To Assess the Therapeutic Relationship Patient Version, STAR-P) would predict depression
outcomes via its influence on the acute psychedelic experience, specifically emotional-breakthrough (EBI) and mystical-type experiences (MEQ). The same analysis was performed on the escitalopram
arm to test specificity.
Results: The strength of therapeutic alliance predicted pre-session rapport, greater emotional-breakthrough and mystical-type experience (maximum EBI and MEQ scores across the two psilocybin sessions) and final QIDS scores (β = -0.22, R2 = 0.42 for EBIMax; β = -0.19, R2 = 0.32 for
MEQMax). Exploratory path models revealed that final depression outcomes were more strongly affected by emotional breakthrough during the first, and mystical experience during the second session. Emotional breakthrough, but not mystical experience, during the first session had a positive effect on therapeutic alliance ahead of the second session (β = 0.79, p < .0001). Therapeutic alliance ahead of the second session had a direct impact on final depression scores, not mediated by the acute
experience, with a weaker alliance ahead of the second psilocybin session predicting higher absolute depression scores at endpoint (β = -0.49, p < .001).
Discussion: Future research could consider therapist training and characteristics; specific participant factors, e.g., attachment style or interpersonal trauma, which may underlie the quality of the therapeutic relationship, the psychedelic experience and clinical outcomes; and consider how therapeutic approaches might adapt in cases of weaker therapeutic alliance.
Date Issued
2022-03-31
Date Acceptance
2021-12-07
Citation
Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2022, 12, pp.1-19
ISSN
1663-9812
Publisher
Frontiers Media
Start Page
1
End Page
19
Journal / Book Title
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Volume
12
Copyright Statement
© 2022 Murphy, Kettner, Zeifman, Giribaldi, Kartner, Martell, Read, Murphy-Beiner, Baker-Jones, Nutt, Erritzoe, Watts and Carhart-Harris. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
License URL
Identifier
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.788155/full#h15
Subjects
1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
788155
Date Publish Online
2022-03-31
