Optimisation of adaptive shock control bumps with structural constraints
File(s)1-s2.0-S1270963817320102-main.pdf (1.48 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Jinks, Ed
Bruce, Paul
Santer, Matthew
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
This paper presents the results from a study to design an optimal adaptive
shock control bump for a transonic aerofoil. An optimisation framework
comprising aerodynamic and structural computational tools has been used to
assess the performance of candidate adaptive bump geometries based on a novel
surface-pressure-based performance metric. The geometry of the optimal resultant
design is a unique feature of its adaptivity; being strongly in
uenced
by the (passive) aerodynamic pressure forces on the
exible surface as well as
the (active) displacement constraints. This optimal geometry bifurcates the
shock-wave and carefully manages the recovering post-shock
ow to maximise
pressure-smearing in the shock-region with only a small penalty in L=D for the
aerofoil. Short adaptive bumps (with small imposed displacements) generally
perform better than taller ones, and maintain their performance advantage for
a wide range of bump positions, suggesting good robustness to variations in
shock position, which are an inevitable feature of a real-world
ight application.
Such devices may o er advantages over conventional ( xed geometry) shock
control bumps, where optimal performance is achieved with taller devices, at
the expense of poor robustness to variations in shock position.
Keywords: Shock Control Bumps; Aeroelastic Optimisation
shock control bump for a transonic aerofoil. An optimisation framework
comprising aerodynamic and structural computational tools has been used to
assess the performance of candidate adaptive bump geometries based on a novel
surface-pressure-based performance metric. The geometry of the optimal resultant
design is a unique feature of its adaptivity; being strongly in
uenced
by the (passive) aerodynamic pressure forces on the
exible surface as well as
the (active) displacement constraints. This optimal geometry bifurcates the
shock-wave and carefully manages the recovering post-shock
ow to maximise
pressure-smearing in the shock-region with only a small penalty in L=D for the
aerofoil. Short adaptive bumps (with small imposed displacements) generally
perform better than taller ones, and maintain their performance advantage for
a wide range of bump positions, suggesting good robustness to variations in
shock position, which are an inevitable feature of a real-world
ight application.
Such devices may o er advantages over conventional ( xed geometry) shock
control bumps, where optimal performance is achieved with taller devices, at
the expense of poor robustness to variations in shock position.
Keywords: Shock Control Bumps; Aeroelastic Optimisation
Date Issued
2018-06-01
Date Acceptance
2018-03-13
Citation
Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 77, pp.332-343
ISSN
1270-9638
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
332
End Page
343
Journal / Book Title
Aerospace Science and Technology
Volume
77
Copyright Statement
© 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. This is
an open access article under the CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
an open access article under the CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Sponsor
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Grant Number
EP/K503381/1
Subjects
Science & Technology
Technology
Engineering, Aerospace
Engineering
Shock control bumps
Aeroelastic optimisation
3-DIMENSIONAL BUMPS
DRAG REDUCTION
FLOW-CONTROL
0901 Aerospace Engineering
0913 Mechanical Engineering
Aerospace & Aeronautics
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2018-03-16