Galaxy mass profiles from strong lensing III: The two-dimensional broken power-law model
File(s)2007.11588v2.pdf (811.45 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
O'Riordan, Conor M
Warren, Stephen J
Mortlock, Daniel J
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
When modelling strong gravitational lenses, i.e., where there are multiple
images of the same source, the most widely used parameterisation for the mass
profile in the lens galaxy is the singular power-law model $\rho(r)\propto
r^{-\gamma}$. This model may be insufficiently flexible for very accurate work,
for example measuring the Hubble constant based on time delays between multiple
images. Here we derive the lensing properties - deflection angle, shear, and
magnification - of a more adaptable model where the projected mass surface
density is parameterised as a continuous two-dimensional broken power-law
(2DBPL). This elliptical 2DBPL model is characterised by power-law slopes
$t_1$, $t_2$ either side of the break radius $\theta_\mathrm{B}$. The key to
the 2DBPL model is the derivation of the lensing properties of the truncated
power law (TPL) model, where the surface density is a power law out to the
truncation radius $\theta_\mathrm{T}$ and zero beyond. This TPL model is also
useful by itself. We create mock observations of lensing by a TPL profile where
the images form outside the truncation radius, so there is no mass in the
annulus covered by the images. We then show that the slope of the profile
interior to the images may be accurately recovered for lenses of moderate
ellipticity. This demonstrates that the widely-held notion that lensing
measures the slope of the mass profile in the annulus of the images, and is
insensitive to the mass distribution at radii interior to the images, is
incorrect.
images of the same source, the most widely used parameterisation for the mass
profile in the lens galaxy is the singular power-law model $\rho(r)\propto
r^{-\gamma}$. This model may be insufficiently flexible for very accurate work,
for example measuring the Hubble constant based on time delays between multiple
images. Here we derive the lensing properties - deflection angle, shear, and
magnification - of a more adaptable model where the projected mass surface
density is parameterised as a continuous two-dimensional broken power-law
(2DBPL). This elliptical 2DBPL model is characterised by power-law slopes
$t_1$, $t_2$ either side of the break radius $\theta_\mathrm{B}$. The key to
the 2DBPL model is the derivation of the lensing properties of the truncated
power law (TPL) model, where the surface density is a power law out to the
truncation radius $\theta_\mathrm{T}$ and zero beyond. This TPL model is also
useful by itself. We create mock observations of lensing by a TPL profile where
the images form outside the truncation radius, so there is no mass in the
annulus covered by the images. We then show that the slope of the profile
interior to the images may be accurately recovered for lenses of moderate
ellipticity. This demonstrates that the widely-held notion that lensing
measures the slope of the mass profile in the annulus of the images, and is
insensitive to the mass distribution at radii interior to the images, is
incorrect.
Date Acceptance
2020-11-27
Citation
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 501 (3), pp.3687-3694
ISSN
0035-8711
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Start Page
3687
End Page
3694
Journal / Book Title
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume
501
Issue
3
Copyright Statement
©2020 Oxford University Press. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version C M O’Riordan, S J Warren, D J Mortlock, Galaxy mass profiles from strong lensing – III. The two-dimensional broken power-law model, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 501, Issue 3, March 2021, Pages 3687–3694, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3747
Sponsor
Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
Identifier
http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.11588v1
Grant Number
ST/S000372/1
Subjects
astro-ph.GA
astro-ph.GA
Notes
8 pages, 3 figures, for submission to MNRAS
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2021-12-08