Sample geometry dependency on the measured tensile properties of cellulose nanopapers
File(s)1-s2.0-S0264127517302162-main.pdf (1.26 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Hervy, M
Santmarti, A
Lahtinen, P
Tammelin, T
Lee, K
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Miniaturised test specimens are often used for the tensile testing of cellulose nanopapers as there are currently no standardised test geometries to evaluate their tensile properties. In this work, we report the influence of test specimen geometries on the measured tensile properties of plant-derived cellulose nanofibres (CNF) and microbially synthesised bacterial cellulose (BC) nanopapers. Four test specimen geometries were studied: (i) miniaturised dog bone specimen with 2 mm width, (ii) miniaturised rectangular specimen with 5 mm width, (iii) standard dog bone specimen with 5 mm width and (iv) standard rectangular specimen with 15 mm width. It was found that the tensile moduli of both CNF and BC nanopapers were not significantly influenced by the test specimen geometries if an independent strain measurement system (video extensometer) was employed. The average tensile strength of the cellulose nanopapers is also influenced by test specimen geometries. It was observed that the smaller the test specimen width, the higher the average tensile strength of the cellulose nanopapers. This can be described by the weakest link theory, whereby the probability of defects present in the cellulose nanopapers increases with increasing test specimen width. The Poisson's ratio and fracture resistance of CNF and BC nanopapers are also discussed.
Date Issued
2017-05-05
Date Acceptance
2017-02-25
Citation
Materials & Design, 2017, 121, pp.421-429
ISSN
0261-3069
Publisher
Elsevier
Start Page
421
End Page
429
Journal / Book Title
Materials & Design
Volume
121
Copyright Statement
© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Sponsor
EPSRC
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Identifier
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127517302162?via%3Dihub
Grant Number
EP/M012247/1
EP/M012247/1
Subjects
Science & Technology
Technology
Materials Science, Multidisciplinary
Materials Science
Cellulose nanofibre
Bacterial cellulose
Cellulose nanopaper
Tensile properties
Fracture toughness
BACTERIAL CELLULOSE
MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES
NANOSTRUCTURED BIOCOMPOSITES
NANOFIBRILLATED CELLULOSE
NANOFIBER NETWORK
ELASTIC-MODULUS
FIBERS
FILMS
STRENGTH
BARRIER
0910 Manufacturing Engineering
0912 Materials Engineering
0913 Mechanical Engineering
Materials
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2017-02-28