The Problem Behaviour Check List: a short scale to assess challenging
behaviours
behaviours
File(s)45.full.pdf (166.07 KB) pbcl paper pdf submitted aug11.pdf (322.98 KB)
Published version
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: Challenging behaviour, especially in intellectual disability, covers a wide range that is in need of further
evaluation.
Aim: To develop a short but comprehensive instrument for all aspects of challenging behaviour.
Method: In the first part of a two-stage enquiry, a 28 item scale was constructed to examine the components of
challenging behaviour. Following a simple factor analysis this was developed further to create a new short scale, the
Problem Behaviour Check List (PBCL). The scale was subsequently used in a randomised controlled trial and tested
for inter-rater reliability. Scores were also compared with a standard scale, the Modified Overt Aggression Scale
(MOAS).
Results: Seven identified factors - personal violence, violence against property, self-harm, sexually inappropriate,
contrary, demanding and disappearing behaviour – were scored on a five point scale. A subsequent factor analysis
with the second population showed demanding, violent and contrary behaviour to account for most of the variance.
Inter-rater reliability using weighted kappa showed good agreement (0.91; 95% CI 0.83-0.99). Good agreement was
also shown with scores on the MOAS scale and a score of 1 on the PBCL showed high sensitivity (97%) and specificity
(85%) for a threshold MOAS score of 4.
Conclusions: The PBCL appears to be a suitable and practical scale for assessing all aspects of challenging behaviour.
evaluation.
Aim: To develop a short but comprehensive instrument for all aspects of challenging behaviour.
Method: In the first part of a two-stage enquiry, a 28 item scale was constructed to examine the components of
challenging behaviour. Following a simple factor analysis this was developed further to create a new short scale, the
Problem Behaviour Check List (PBCL). The scale was subsequently used in a randomised controlled trial and tested
for inter-rater reliability. Scores were also compared with a standard scale, the Modified Overt Aggression Scale
(MOAS).
Results: Seven identified factors - personal violence, violence against property, self-harm, sexually inappropriate,
contrary, demanding and disappearing behaviour – were scored on a five point scale. A subsequent factor analysis
with the second population showed demanding, violent and contrary behaviour to account for most of the variance.
Inter-rater reliability using weighted kappa showed good agreement (0.91; 95% CI 0.83-0.99). Good agreement was
also shown with scores on the MOAS scale and a score of 1 on the PBCL showed high sensitivity (97%) and specificity
(85%) for a threshold MOAS score of 4.
Conclusions: The PBCL appears to be a suitable and practical scale for assessing all aspects of challenging behaviour.
Date Issued
2016-01
Date Acceptance
2015-12-08
Citation
BJPsych Open, 2016, 2 (1), pp.45-49
ISSN
2056-4724
Publisher
Royal College of Psychiatrists
Start Page
45
End Page
49
Journal / Book Title
BJPsych Open
Volume
2
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© 2016 The Royal College of Psychiatrists. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND)
licence.
access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Non-Commercial, No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND)
licence.
Sponsor
Nicola Pigott Fund (Central & NW London Mental NHS Charity T
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust- BRC Funding
Grant Number
N/A
RDB03
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2018-01-02