Monitoring of lactate in interstitial fluid, saliva and sweat by electrochemical biosensor: the uncertainties of biological interpretation
File(s)chemosensors-09-00195 anastasova.pdf (6.67 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Spehar-Deleze, Anna-Maria
Anastasova, Salzitsa
Vadgama, Pankaj
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Lactate electrochemical biosensors were fabricated using Pediococcus sp lactate oxidase (E.C. 1.1.3.2), an external polyurethane membrane laminate diffusion barrier and an internal ionomeric polymer barrier (sulphonated polyether ether sulphone polyether sulphone, SPEES PES). In a needle embodiment, a Pt wire working electrode was retained within stainless steel tubing serving as pseudoreference. The construct gave linearity to at least 25 mM lactate with 0.17 nA/mM lactate sensitivity. A low permeability inner membrane was also unexpectedly able to increase linearity. Responses were oxygen dependent at pO2 < 70 mmHg, irrespective of the inclusion of an external diffusion barrier membrane. Subcutaneous tissue was monitored in Sprague Dawley rats, and saliva and sweat during exercise in human subjects. The tissue sensors registered no response to intravenous Na lactate, indicating a blood-tissue lactate barrier. Salivary lactate allowed tracking of blood lactate during exercise, but lactate levels were substantially lower than those in blood (0–3.5 mM vs. 1.6–12.1 mM), with variable degrees of lactate partitioning from blood, evident both between subjects and at different exercise time points. Sweat lactate during exercise measured up to 23 mM but showed highly inconsistent change as exercise progressed. We conclude that neither tissue interstitial fluid nor sweat are usable as surrogates for blood lactate, and that major reappraisal of lactate sensor use is indicated for any extravascular monitoring strategy for lactate.
Date Issued
2021-08-01
Date Acceptance
2021-07-22
Citation
Chemosensors, 2021, 9 (8), pp.1-17
ISSN
2227-9040
Publisher
MDPI AG
Start Page
1
End Page
17
Journal / Book Title
Chemosensors
Volume
9
Issue
8
Copyright Statement
© 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
License URL
Sponsor
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000688907600001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
Science & Technology
Physical Sciences
Technology
Chemistry, Analytical
Electrochemistry
Instruments & Instrumentation
Chemistry
lactate biosensor
Pediococcus sp lactate oxidase
subcutaneous lactate monitoring
salivary lactate
sweat lactate
exercise
IN-VIVO
AEROCOCCUS-VIRIDANS
OXIDASE
BLOOD
METABOLISM
GLUCOSE
EXERCISE
SENSOR
MICRODIALYSIS
PERMEABILITY
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
ARTN 195
Date Publish Online
2021-07-28