Automated calibration of consensus weighted distance-based clustering approaches using sharp
File(s)btad635.pdf (9.72 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Motivation:
In consensus clustering, a clustering algorithm is used in combination with a subsampling procedure to detect stable clusters. Previous studies on both simulated and real data suggest that consensus clustering outperforms native algorithms.
Results:
We extend here consensus clustering to allow for attribute weighting in the calculation of pairwise distances using existing regularised approaches. We propose a procedure for the calibration of the number of clusters (and regularisation parameter) by maximising the sharp score, a novel stability score calculated directly from consensus clustering outputs, making it extremely computationally competitive. Our simulation study shows better clustering performances of (i) approaches calibrated by maximising the sharp score compared to existing calibration scores, and (ii) weighted compared to unweighted approaches in the presence of features that do not contribute to cluster definition. Application on real gene expression data measured in lung tissue reveals clear clusters corresponding to different lung cancer subtypes.
Availability and implementation:
The R package sharp (version ≥ 1.4.3) is available on CRAN at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sharp.
In consensus clustering, a clustering algorithm is used in combination with a subsampling procedure to detect stable clusters. Previous studies on both simulated and real data suggest that consensus clustering outperforms native algorithms.
Results:
We extend here consensus clustering to allow for attribute weighting in the calculation of pairwise distances using existing regularised approaches. We propose a procedure for the calibration of the number of clusters (and regularisation parameter) by maximising the sharp score, a novel stability score calculated directly from consensus clustering outputs, making it extremely computationally competitive. Our simulation study shows better clustering performances of (i) approaches calibrated by maximising the sharp score compared to existing calibration scores, and (ii) weighted compared to unweighted approaches in the presence of features that do not contribute to cluster definition. Application on real gene expression data measured in lung tissue reveals clear clusters corresponding to different lung cancer subtypes.
Availability and implementation:
The R package sharp (version ≥ 1.4.3) is available on CRAN at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sharp.
Date Issued
2023-11
Date Acceptance
2023-10-02
Citation
Bioinformatics, 2023, 39 (11)
ISSN
1367-4803
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Journal / Book Title
Bioinformatics
Volume
39
Issue
11
Copyright Statement
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
License URL
Identifier
https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/39/11/btad635/7320014
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
btad635
Date Publish Online
2023-10-17