Comparison of general obesity and measures of body fat distribution in older adults in relation to cancer risk: meta-analysis of individual participant data of seven prospective cohorts in Europe
File(s)CHANCES_obesity_measures_CANCER_subm_ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL.pdf (2.43 MB) CHANCES_obesity_measures_cancer_subm_Sept16.docx (10.15 MB)
Supporting information
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background:
We evaluated the associations of anthropometric indicators of general obesity (body mass index, BMI), an
established risk factor of various cancer, and body fat distribution (waist circumference, WC; hip circumference, HC; and waist-to-
hip ratio, WHR), which may better reflect metabolic complications of obesity, with total obesity-related and site-specific (colorectal
and postmenopausal breast) cancer incidence.
Methods:
This is a meta-analysis of seven prospective cohort studies participating in the CHANCES consortium including 18 668
men and 24 751 women with a mean age of 62 and 63 years, respectively. Harmonised individual participant data from all seven
cohorts were analysed separately and alternatively for each anthropometric indicator using multivariable Cox proportional hazards
models.
Results:
After a median follow-up period of 12 years, 1656 first-incident obesity-related cancers (defined as postmenopausal
female breast, colorectum, lower oesophagus, cardia stomach, liver, gallbladder, pancreas, endometrium, ovary, and kidney) had
occurred in men and women. In the meta-analysis of all studies, associations between indicators of adiposity, per s.d. increment,
and risk for all obesity-related cancers combined yielded the following summary hazard ratios: 1.11 (95% CI 1.02–1.21) for BMI, 1.13
(95% CI 1.04–1.23) for WC, 1.09 (95% CI 0.98–1.21) for HC, and 1.15 (95% CI 1.00–1.32) for WHR. Increases in risk for colorectal
cancer were 16%, 21%, 15%, and 20%, respectively per s.d. of BMI, WC, HC, and WHR. Effect modification by hormone therapy
(HT) use was observed for postmenopausal breast cancer (
P
interaction
o
0.001), where never HT users showed an
B
20% increased
risk per s.d. of BMI, WC, and HC compared to ever users.
Conclusions:
BMI, WC, HC, and WHR show comparable positive associations with obesity-related cancers combined and with
colorectal cancer in older adults. For postmenopausal breast cancer we report evidence for effect modification by HT use.
We evaluated the associations of anthropometric indicators of general obesity (body mass index, BMI), an
established risk factor of various cancer, and body fat distribution (waist circumference, WC; hip circumference, HC; and waist-to-
hip ratio, WHR), which may better reflect metabolic complications of obesity, with total obesity-related and site-specific (colorectal
and postmenopausal breast) cancer incidence.
Methods:
This is a meta-analysis of seven prospective cohort studies participating in the CHANCES consortium including 18 668
men and 24 751 women with a mean age of 62 and 63 years, respectively. Harmonised individual participant data from all seven
cohorts were analysed separately and alternatively for each anthropometric indicator using multivariable Cox proportional hazards
models.
Results:
After a median follow-up period of 12 years, 1656 first-incident obesity-related cancers (defined as postmenopausal
female breast, colorectum, lower oesophagus, cardia stomach, liver, gallbladder, pancreas, endometrium, ovary, and kidney) had
occurred in men and women. In the meta-analysis of all studies, associations between indicators of adiposity, per s.d. increment,
and risk for all obesity-related cancers combined yielded the following summary hazard ratios: 1.11 (95% CI 1.02–1.21) for BMI, 1.13
(95% CI 1.04–1.23) for WC, 1.09 (95% CI 0.98–1.21) for HC, and 1.15 (95% CI 1.00–1.32) for WHR. Increases in risk for colorectal
cancer were 16%, 21%, 15%, and 20%, respectively per s.d. of BMI, WC, HC, and WHR. Effect modification by hormone therapy
(HT) use was observed for postmenopausal breast cancer (
P
interaction
o
0.001), where never HT users showed an
B
20% increased
risk per s.d. of BMI, WC, and HC compared to ever users.
Conclusions:
BMI, WC, HC, and WHR show comparable positive associations with obesity-related cancers combined and with
colorectal cancer in older adults. For postmenopausal breast cancer we report evidence for effect modification by HT use.
Date Issued
2017-04-25
Date Acceptance
2017-03-27
Citation
British Journal of Cancer, 2017, 116 (11), pp.1486-1497
ISSN
0007-0920
Publisher
Springer Nature
Start Page
1486
End Page
1497
Journal / Book Title
British Journal of Cancer
Volume
116
Issue
11
Copyright Statement
© 2017 Cancer Research UK. All rights reserved
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000402044800015&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Oncology
CHANCES consortium
ageing
cohort
obesity
body fat distribution
cancer
prevention
DOSE-RESPONSE METAANALYSIS
NIH-AARP DIET
MASS INDEX
GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA
ANTHROPOMETRIC FACTORS
WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE
COLORECTAL-CANCER
PANCREATIC-CANCER
ABDOMINAL OBESITY
UNITED-STATES
Publication Status
Published