The best of both worlds: can founder-ceos overcome the rich vs. King dilemma after IPO?
File(s)asma Main document.docx (125.97 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Wright, DM
Fatoum, Asma
Delmar, Frederic
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Research Summary: To prevent loss of control post‐IPO, founder‐CEOs can implement control‐enhancing mechanisms disconnecting ownership from voting rights. However, this decision places them in a rich versus king dilemma. If they choose to implement such mechanisms and secure the king position, they risk losing money at IPO. If they choose not to implement control‐enhancing mechanisms and adopt the rich position they risk losing control over the firm. We investigate theoretically and empirically the outcomes of this dilemma in a multi‐period setting (at IPO and post‐IPO). We found that the majority of founder‐CEOs who choose the king option recover initial wealth loss, and hence, they can reconcile the rich and king paths in the long‐run post‐IPO.
Managerial Summary: Founder‐CEOs often use control‐enhancing mechanisms (CEMs), such dual class shares, pyramid control structures, and pact agreements, to maintain control over their IPO firms. In this study, we investigate the effects of these CEMs on firm value at IPO and post‐IPO using a unique hand‐collected dataset comprising all founder‐CEO led firms that went public on French regulated markets between January 1992 and December 2010. We found that most founder‐CEOs who use multiple CEMs leave considerable amounts of money on the table at IPO date but they are able to recover their initial loss 5 years post‐IPO. This result suggests that an IPO may constitute a valuable financing alternative even for founder‐CEOs who value control.
Managerial Summary: Founder‐CEOs often use control‐enhancing mechanisms (CEMs), such dual class shares, pyramid control structures, and pact agreements, to maintain control over their IPO firms. In this study, we investigate the effects of these CEMs on firm value at IPO and post‐IPO using a unique hand‐collected dataset comprising all founder‐CEO led firms that went public on French regulated markets between January 1992 and December 2010. We found that most founder‐CEOs who use multiple CEMs leave considerable amounts of money on the table at IPO date but they are able to recover their initial loss 5 years post‐IPO. This result suggests that an IPO may constitute a valuable financing alternative even for founder‐CEOs who value control.
Date Issued
2018-09-21
Date Acceptance
2018-09-06
Citation
Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39 (13), pp.3382-3407
ISSN
0143-2095
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
3382
End Page
3407
Journal / Book Title
Strategic Management Journal
Volume
39
Issue
13
Copyright Statement
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is the accepted version of the following article, which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/smj.2960
Identifier
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/smj.2960
Subjects
Social Sciences
Business
Management
Business & Economics
anti-takeover mechanisms
founder-CEOs
IPOs
ownership structure
principal-principal agency cost
INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS
SOCIAL EMBEDDEDNESS RECONCILIATION
PRIVATE EQUITY INVESTORS
EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE
MANAGERIAL MYOPIA
CORPORATE-CONTROL
PERFORMANCE
FIRMS
POWER
Business & Management
1503 Business and Management
1505 Marketing
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2018-09-21