Latching-Declutching Control of Wave Energy Converters Using Derivative-Free Optimization
File(s)WEC_journal_paper-zf.pdf (483.96 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Feng, Z
Kerrigan, EC
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
We consider predictive control of a wave energy converter
(WEC) that can switch between three modes: 1) power
generation; 2) declutched with no power generation; or 3) latched
with zero velocity. We propose a formulation that turns the optimal
control problem into a small dimensional discrete optimization
problem, where the only decision variables are bounds on
the latching time and power take-off (PTO) time, whereas the
objective function is computed from the trajectory of a hybrid
system with linear dynamics in each sample interval. The optimization
problem is solved using a novel derivative-free algorithm
that exploits the quantization of the decision variables in order
to reduce the number of function evaluations. Two closed-loop
formulations are also studied within a receding horizon implementation:
the first one uses past wave information and can double the
energy generation compared to the uncontrolled case, while the
second formulation uses predictions of future waves and is able to
result in a further increase in energy generation. The benefits of
codesigning the physical system and controller is compared to the
sequential approach of first optimizing the physical system without
control, followed by controller design.
(WEC) that can switch between three modes: 1) power
generation; 2) declutched with no power generation; or 3) latched
with zero velocity. We propose a formulation that turns the optimal
control problem into a small dimensional discrete optimization
problem, where the only decision variables are bounds on
the latching time and power take-off (PTO) time, whereas the
objective function is computed from the trajectory of a hybrid
system with linear dynamics in each sample interval. The optimization
problem is solved using a novel derivative-free algorithm
that exploits the quantization of the decision variables in order
to reduce the number of function evaluations. Two closed-loop
formulations are also studied within a receding horizon implementation:
the first one uses past wave information and can double the
energy generation compared to the uncontrolled case, while the
second formulation uses predictions of future waves and is able to
result in a further increase in energy generation. The benefits of
codesigning the physical system and controller is compared to the
sequential approach of first optimizing the physical system without
control, followed by controller design.
Date Issued
2015-07-01
Date Acceptance
2015-03-04
Citation
IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2015, 6 (3), pp.773-780
ISSN
1949-3029
Publisher
IEEE
Start Page
773
End Page
780
Journal / Book Title
IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy
Volume
6
Issue
3
Copyright Statement
© 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.
Subjects
Science & Technology
Technology
Energy & Fuels
Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
Engineering
Codesign
coordinate search (CS)
declutching control (DC)
derivative-free optimization
latching control
wave energy
DEVICE
Publication Status
Published