Repository logo
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Statistics
  • Log In
    Log in via Symplectic to deposit your publication(s).
  1. Home
  2. Faculty of Natural Sciences
  3. Centre for Environmental Policy
  4. Centre for Environmental Policy
  5. Why home gardens fail in enhancing food security and dietary diversity
 
  • Details
Why home gardens fail in enhancing food security and dietary diversity
File(s)
fevo-10-804523.pdf (2.03 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Du Toit, Marié J
Rendón, Olivia
Cologna, Viktoria
Cilliers, Sarel S
Dallimer, Martin
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Visions of sustainable cities mostly conjure up well tended home and community gardens, where owners and residents plant fruits and vegetables that supply some of their livelihood needs. Indeed, home gardens can contribute to household food security but often fail to do so. Moreover, gardens can provide several additional ecosystem services and impact entire communities. This paper seeks to answer why these gardens often do not provide adequate services to make a substantial contribution to food security and identifies possible solutions. We undertook a case study in South Africa in a low-income former township area. The area is characterized by poverty, high levels of unemployment and food insecurity. We interviewed 140 respondents with home gardens to determine what role their own garden plays in household food security. Only 10% of households were found to be completely food secure. Of the rest, 39% experienced hunger that affected everyone in the household and 51% were at risk of hunger. Despite the fact that 72% of the respondents planted vegetables or fruits, the gardens did not contribute substantially to food security. The respondents mostly bought their food, with subsequent food shortages when they did not have enough money. The dietary diversity and consumption of vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables were very low. The most important constraints inhibiting urban agriculture in the study area were cultural practices, such as the presence of large, bare, open spaces, or “lebala,” the focus of home gardeners on ornamental species and lawns; and a reliance on purchasing of foods.
Date Issued
2022-02-11
Date Acceptance
2022-01-11
Citation
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 10
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/111814
URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.804523
DOI
https://www.dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.804523
ISSN
2296-701X
Publisher
Frontiers Media S.A.
Journal / Book Title
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Volume
10
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2022 Du Toit, Rendón, Cologna, Cilliers and Dallimer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
License URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Identifier
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.804523
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
804523
Date Publish Online
2022-02-11
About
Spiral Depositing with Spiral Publishing with Spiral Symplectic
Contact us
Open access team Report an issue
Other Services
Scholarly Communications Library Services
logo

Imperial College London

South Kensington Campus

London SW7 2AZ, UK

tel: +44 (0)20 7589 5111

Accessibility Modern slavery statement Cookie Policy

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback