The ultra-processed food content of school meals and packed lunches in the United Kingdom (2008-2017)

Abstract Background British children have the highest ultra-processed food (UPF) intake in Europe, which is linked to adverse health outcomes. Schools are posited as a setting for dietary intervention, yet the level of UPFs consumed at schools is currently unknown. This study aimed to describe the UPF content of school food in the UK, explore the UPF content of school meals and packed lunches (food from home) and examine whether UPF differs by children's household income. Methods A pooled cross-sectional analysis of primary (4-11 years, n = 1,895) and secondary schoolchildren (11-18 years, n = 1,408) from the UK's National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2008-2017) was conducted. Food diaries recorded student's meal-type (school meal/packed lunch). UPF intake was defined using the NOVA food classification system. Quantile regression models assessed the association between meal-type and lunchtime UPF intake (%kcal and % grams). Models were stratified by school phase (primary/secondary) and interacted meal-type with income. Results Schoolchildren consumed most of their lunch as UPF, with higher median intakes in secondary schoolchildren than primary schoolchildren (77.8 %kcal vs 72.6 %kcal). School meals were associated with lower median UPF intake (%kcal) in both primary (-20 percentage-points[pp] [95% CI -22.2, -17.4]) and secondary schoolchildren (-11pp [-16.0,-7.0]) compared with packed lunches. Results were similar when UPF %g was analysed. Overall, income was inversely associated with UPF content. However, in primary schoolchildren there was no significant income gradient in the UPF(%g) content of school meals. Conclusions In the first nationally representative study, we showed that on average UPF intake was high in all UK schoolchildren. Higher UPF intakes were observed in packed lunch consumers, secondary schoolchildren, and those with a lower income. Procurement policies must be revaluated to protect children from high UPF intake. Funders: NIHR School for Public Health Research Key messages • In the first study of ultra-processed food content of UK school food, we show that children consumed around three quarters of their energy as ultra-processed food at lunch. • Children who were older, took food from home or were from a low-income household were more likely to consume higher levels of ultra-processed food. Regulation is needed to protect these children.


Background:
British children have the highest ultra-processed food (UPF) intake in Europe, which is linked to adverse health outcomes. Schools are posited as a setting for dietary intervention, yet the level of UPFs consumed at schools is currently unknown. This study aimed to describe the UPF content of school food in the UK, explore the UPF content of school meals and packed lunches (food from home) and examine whether UPF differs by children's household income.

Methods:
A pooled cross-sectional analysis of primary (4-11 years, n = 1,895) and secondary schoolchildren (11-18 years, n = 1,408) from the UK's National Diet andNutrition Survey (2008-2017) was conducted. Food diaries recorded student's meal-type (school meal/packed lunch). UPF intake was defined using the NOVA food classification system. Quantile regression models assessed the association between meal-type and lunchtime UPF intake (%kcal and % grams). Models were stratified by school phase (primary/secondary) and interacted meal-type with income.

Results:
Schoolchildren consumed most of their lunch as UPF, with higher median intakes in secondary schoolchildren than primary schoolchildren (77.8 %kcal vs 72.6 %kcal). School meals were associated with lower median UPF intake (%kcal) in both primary (-20 percentage-points[pp] [95% CI -22.2, -17.4]) and secondary schoolchildren (-11pp [-16.0,-7.0]) compared with packed lunches. Results were similar when UPF %g was analysed. Overall, income was inversely associated with UPF content. However, in primary schoolchildren there was no significant income gradient in the UPF(%g) content of school meals.

Conclusions:
In the first nationally representative study, we showed that on average UPF intake was high in all UK schoolchildren. Higher UPF intakes were observed in packed lunch consumers, secondary schoolchildren, and those with a lower income. Procurement policies must be revaluated to protect children from high UPF intake. Funders: NIHR School for Public Health Research Key messages: In the first study of ultra-processed food content of UK school food, we show that children consumed around three quarters of their energy as ultra-processed food at lunch. Children who were older, took food from home or were from a low-income household were more likely to consume higher levels of ultra-processed food. Regulation is needed to protect these children.

Background:
Food environments influence food preferences, in particular among children. Besides their homes, children spend most of their time in and around the school. This study mapped changes in retail food environments around primary and secondary schools in Flanders between 2008 and 2020. In addition, associations between those indicators and children's weight status were assessed.

Methods:
The food environment near primary and secondary schools was mapped using three spatial indicators: 1) The density of different types of food retailers within 1000m road distance from the school entrance, 2) the percentage of schools with at least one food retailer of a certain type within 1000m road distance from the entrance, and 3) the median walking distance from the school entrance to the nearest food retailer of a certain type. Associations between the density of convenience stores, as well as fast food outlets around the schools and the weight status of the schools' children were assessed using generalized linear models adjusted for level of urbanization, socio-economic status of children at school level and sex.

Results:
Food environments near schools in Flanders were found to be unhealthy, with a significant increase in fast-food outlets and convenience stores between 2008 and 2020. Food environments near schools with a higher proportion of children from a poor socio-economic background were found more unhealthy than those near schools with a lower proportion of such children, regardless of the urbanization level. A significant positive association was found between the density of fast food outlets as well as convenience stores around